Assessing sexual aggression: Addressing the gap between rape victimization and perpetration prevalence rates
Assessing sexual aggression: Addressing the gap between rape victimization and perpetration prevalence rates
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.avb.2006.10.002
复制
发表时间：
2007-05-01
影响因子：
4.6
通讯作者：
Gross, Alan M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kolivas, Elizabeth D.;Gross, Alan M.
事实证明，获得女性性侵经历和男性性侵历史的一致和准确的比率是困难的，而且在整个文献中比率差异很大[Koss，M.P.(1993A)]。检测强奸的范围：流行率研究方法的回顾。人际暴力期刊，8(2)，198-222]。有人认为，方法因素影响了对女性性侵经历的发现，并导致了比率差异[Fisher，B.S.，Cullen，F.T.&Turner，M.G.(2000)]。大学女生的性侵害(《纽约联邦判例汇编》182369)。华盛顿特区：司法统计局，国家司法研究所；Hamby，S.L.&Koss，M.(2003年)。灰色度量学：对用于测量性侵害的术语进行的定量研究。《女性心理学季刊》，27,243-255；科斯，M.P.(1993A)。检测强奸的范围：流行率研究方法的回顾。人际暴力期刊，8(2)，198-222]。在评估女性遭受性侵犯的经历时，通常使用调查方法。男性的性侵行为史通常是使用与女性相同的调查工具进行调查的。当这些评估方法应用于女性时，影响这些评估方法的可靠性、有效性和实用性的变量知道得很多，但对这些因素在评估男性自我报告的攻击性方面的影响却知之甚少。本文讨论了当前的性侵害和性行为发生率和流行率。本文概述了这些数据的主要来源，并对影响妇女强奸侦破水平的已知方法因素进行了审查。本文对这些问题在测量男性性侵犯中的相关性进行了讨论，并对未来的研究提出了建议。(C)2006爱思唯尔有限公司。保留所有权利。
Obtaining consistent and accurate rates of women's sexual assault experiences and men's history of sexual aggression has proved difficult and rates vary tremendously throughout the literature [Koss, M.P. (1993a). Detecting the scope of rape: A review of prevalence research methods. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8 (2), 198-222]. It has been suggested that methodological factors influence the detection of women's sexual assault experiences and contribute to the rate disparities [Fisher, B. S., Cullen, F. T. & Turner, M. G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women (NCJ 182369). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, National Institute of Justice.; Hamby, S. L. & Koss, M. (2003). Shades of gray: A quantitative study of terms used in the measurement of sexual victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 243-255.; Koss, M.P. (1993a). Detecting the scope of rape: A review of prevalence research methods. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8 (2), 198-222]. Survey methods are commonly used in the assessment of women's experience with sexual assault victimization. Men's history of sexually aggressive behaviors is typically examined using parallel versions of the survey instruments used with women. While much is known about variables affecting the reliability, validity, and utility of these assessment methods when applied to women, less is known about the influence of these factors in the assessment of men's self-reported aggression. This paper discusses current sexual victimization and perpetration incidence and prevalence rates. An overview of the major sources of these data, as well as a review of the methodological factors known to influence levels of rape detection in women is presented. An examination of how these issues may be relevant in the measurement of male sexual aggression is discussed with suggestions for future research. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.