Thulium Laser Resection Versus Plasmakinetic Resection of Prostates in the Treatment of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis
Thulium Laser Resection Versus Plasmakinetic Resection of Prostates in the Treatment of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis
复制标题
铥激光切除术与前列腺等离子动力切除术治疗良性前列腺增生的荟萃分析
DOI：
10.1089/lap.2016.0044
复制
发表时间：
2016-10-01
影响因子：
1.3
通讯作者：
Ye, Zhangqun
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Zhao, Chenming;Yang, Huan;Ye, Zhangqun
目的：为比较经尿道前列腺激光切除术（ThuRP）和等离子体前列腺切除术（PKRP）治疗良性前列腺增生症（BPH）的安全性和有效性，我们对两种技术进行了荟萃分析。方法：对PubMed、Web of Science和中国国家知识基础设施进行了系统检索，截止日期为2015年10月1日。评估这两种技术的结果包括人口统计学和临床特征、围手术期变量、随访数据和并发症。结果如下：确定了9项评估ThuRP与PKRP治疗BPH的合格试验，包括6项随机对照试验（RCT）和3项回顾性试验。ThuRP与手术时间相关（P
Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of thulium laser resection of prostate (ThuRP) and plasmakinetic resection of prostate (PKRP) for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), we made this meta-analysis in regard of the two techniques. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure was performed up to October 1, 2015. Outcomes of interest assessing the two techniques included demographic and clinical characteristics, perioperative variables, follow-up data, and complications. Results: Nine eligible trials evaluating ThuRP versus PKRP for BPH were identified, including six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three retrospective trials. ThuRP was associated with longer operation time (P