Word Translation Entropy: Evidence of Early Target Language Activation During Reading for Translation
Word Translation Entropy: Evidence of Early Target Language Activation During Reading for Translation
复制标题
词翻译熵：翻译阅读过程中早期目标语言激活的证据
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Carl
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Schaeffer;Barbara Dragsted;Kristian Tangsgaard Hvelplund;Laura Winther Balling;M. Carl
本研究旨在探讨单个词的翻译选择数量与源文本眼动之间的关系。此外，本文还研究了源语和目标语语序差异对源语眼动的影响。特别是，目前的研究调查了这些变量对早期和晚期眼动措施的影响。早期眼动测量指示更自动的过程，而晚期测量更指示有意识的处理。大多数研究发现，在翻译中的源文本阅读过程中，目标语激活的证据，即两个语言系统的共同激活，采用后期眼动测量或反应时间。因此，本研究的目的是探讨在翻译阅读过程中早期眼动测量是否以及在多大程度上显示出共激活的证据。结果表明，翻译选项的数量为一个单一的词和源和目标文本之间的差异，在词序有影响的非常早期和晚期的眼动措施。结果被解释在语义和结构的跨语言启动：项目具有相似的词序在源和目标文本可能有相似的句法结构。因此，这些项目更有可能在结构上启动。具有较少翻译替代方案的源项更有可能共享语义表示，因此更有可能比具有更多翻译替代方案的项在语义上启动。研究结果支持直译假设。
This study reports on an investigation into the relationship between the number of translation alternatives for a single word and eye movements on the source text. In addition, the effect of word order differences between source and target text on eye movements on the source text is studied. In particular, the current study investigates the effect of these variables on early and late eye movement measures. Early eye movement measures are indicative of processes that are more automatic while late measures are more indicative of conscious processing. Most studies that found evidence of target language activation during source text reading in translation, i.e. co-activation of the two linguistic systems, employed late eye movement measures or reaction times. The current study therefore aims to investigate if and to what extent earlier eye movement measures in reading for translation show evidence of co-activation. Results show that the number of translation alternatives for a single word and differences between source and target text in terms of word order have an effect on very early and late eye movement measures. Results are interpreted in terms of semantic and structural cross-linguistic priming: items which have a similar word order in source and target texts are likely to have similar syntactic structures. These items are therefore more likely to prime structurally. Source items which have few translation alternatives are more likely to share a semantic representation and are hence more likely to prime semantically than items with more translation alternatives. Findings support the literal translation hypothesis.
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2015-10
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Douglas M. Bates;M. Maechler;Ben Bolker;Steven C. Walker
通讯作者：
Douglas M. Bates;M. Maechler;Ben Bolker;Steven C. Walker
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.21.6.1430
发表时间：
1995-11-01
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
HYONA, J;OLSON, RK
通讯作者：
OLSON, RK
影响因子：
6.3
作者：
M. Just;P. Carpenter
通讯作者：
M. Just;P. Carpenter