Intergroup bias: status, differentiation, and a common in-group identity.
Intergroup bias: status, differentiation, and a common in-group identity.
复制标题
群体间偏见：地位、差异和共同的群体内身份。
DOI：
10.1037//0022-3514.75.1.109
复制
发表时间：
1998
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Validzic,A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dovidio,JF;Gaertner,SL;Validzic,A
本研究考察了影响组间偏向减少的因素。两个三人实验室小组首先在一项任务上分开工作，在小组间接触之前被告知：(A)小组的地位根据他们的任务表现而相等或不平等，(B)他们一直在相同或不同的任务维度上工作。与M.Hewstone和RJ Brown(1986)的相互群体间分化模型一致，当群体的专长领域被区分并被同等评价时(即，在平等地位-不同维度的条件下)，偏见被消除。此外，正如预期的那样，在共同的群体内认同模型的基础上，更具包容性的群体表征中介了这一效应。因此，本研究的结果提供了一个理论整合，可以建议干预措施，以促进积极的群体间接触。(心理信息组织数据库记录(C)2016 APA，保留所有权利)
The present research examined factors that moderate and mediate the reduction of intergroup bias. Two 3-person laboratory groups, which had first worked separately on a task, were informed prior to intergroup contact that (a) the groups were equal or unequal in status based on their task performance, and (b) they had been working on the same or on different task dimensions. Consistent with M. Hewstone and RJ Brown's (1986) mutual intergroup differentiation model, bias was eliminated when the groups' areas of expertise were differentiated and equally valued (ie, in the equal status–different dimensions condition). Moreover, as expected on the basis of the common in-group identity model, more inclusive group representations mediated this effect. The findings of the present research thus offer a theoretical integration that can suggest interventions to facilitate positive intergroup contact.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)