Reply to "CD8+ T cells are essential for controlling acute FV infection in B6 mice."
Reply to "CD8+ T cells are essential for controlling acute FV infection in B6 mice."
复制标题
回复“CD8 T 细胞对于控制 B6 小鼠的急性 FV 感染至关重要”。
DOI:
10.1128/jvi.00343-14
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
and M. Miyazawa
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tsuji-Kawahara;S.;S. Takamura;and M. Miyazawa
I n the letter entitled “CD8+ T Cells Are Essential for Controlling Acute Friend Retrovirus Infection in C57BL/6 Mice”(1), Joedicke et al. raised some questions about interpretations of the data presented in our recent letter (2). First, they point out that the lack of CD8+ T cells in β2-microglobulin (β2m)-deficient mice might be compensated for by enhanced responses of other immune cell subsets. To support this notion, the authors cite their recent paper in this journal (3) and state that CD4+ T cells do not normally develop cytotoxicity in response to FV infection, but do so in the absence of CD8+ T cells. However, the induction of cytotoxic functions with the expression of discriminative cytolytic molecules, including granzymes and perforin, in CD4+ T cells is not an exceptional phenomenon, but a recent report has demonstrated a large degree of plasticity in reprogramming of mature CD4+ T cells into cytotoxic cells (4). Thus, mature, antigen-experienced CD4+ T cells can terminate the expression of the master regulator of helper T-cell differentiation and switch to cytotoxic effector cells in response to chronic or strong stimulation. In fact, we have shown that CD4+ T cells can exert cytotoxic activities upon FV infection in the presence of CD8+ T cells when FV-susceptible mice are primed beforehand with an FV-derived CD4+ T-cell epitope through vaccination with a synthetic peptide (5). Further, if CD8+ T-cell functions can be replaced with those of other immune cells, they are not essential but dispensable by definition.Joedicke et al.(1) also claim that Lyt2 (CD8α)-deficient mice are completely devoid of CD8+ T cells, while the β2m-deficient mice we used may possess residual CD8+ T cells, which might have contributed to the observed FV elimination. However, cells in β2m-deficient mice totally lack the expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules on their surfaces (6), and thus, even if there were residual CD8+ T cells, such cells cannot recognize virus-infected target cells. On the contrary, it has long been known that CD8 coreceptors are not crucial for the development and effector functions of MHC class I-restricted T cells. In fact, mice deficient in the CD8α chain (CD8 knockout) efficiently rejected MHC class I-disparate skin grafts even when they were depleted of CD4+ T cells, and donor cell-specific cytotoxic activity was detected in the CD8 knockout recipient mice (7). Further, wild-type and CD8 knockout C57BL/6 (B6) mice were equally resistant to mouse polyomavirus infection, while β2m-deficient mice were susceptible, and CD3+ CD4 J T cells that bound to the MHC class I tetramer loaded with a Db-restricted, dominant polyomavirus epitope were detected in infected CD8 knockout mice (8, 9). As MHC class I-restricted cytotoxic effector cells can be generated in the CD8 knockout mice Joedicke et al. used, while such cells cannot lyse class I-deficient target cells, we would conclude that β2m-deficient mice are better suited for evaluating the role of class I-restricted cytotoxic T cells in FV infection than CD8 knockout mice.