TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF RESEARCH USING IMPLICIT MEASURES
TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF RESEARCH USING IMPLICIT MEASURES
复制标题
DOI：
10.1521/soco.2020.38.supp.s1
复制
发表时间：
2020-11-01
期刊：
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Sherman, Jeffrey W.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gawronski, Bertram;De Houwer, Jan;Sherman, Jeffrey W.
2020年是两个开创性出版物发表25周年，这两个出版物为使用隐含测量的指数增长的研究奠定了基础：Fazio，杰克逊，Dunton和威廉姆斯（1995）的工作使用评价启动来测量种族态度，以及Greenwald和Banaji（1995）对内隐社会认知研究的回顾，这些研究是内隐联想测验（IAT）发展的基础。本文概述了（1）继续塑造内隐测量解释的两个概念根源;（2）对术语内隐的相互冲突的解释;（3）内隐测量和外显测量之间的不同类型的分离;（1）由这些分离激发的理论发展;（5）使用内隐测量解决特定领域和应用问题的研究。最后，我们讨论的挑战和开放的问题，仍然有待解决，为下一代的研究使用隐式措施提供指导。
The year 2020 marks the 25th anniversary of two seminal publications that have set the foundation for an exponentially growing body of research using implicit measures: Fazio, Jackson, Dunton, and Williams's (1995) work using evaluative priming to measure racial attitudes, and Greenwald and Banaji's (1995) review of implicit social cognition research that served as the basis for the development of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). The current article provides an overview of (1) two conceptual roots that continue to shape interpretations of implicit measures; (2) conflicting interpretations of the term implicit; (3) different kinds of dissociations between implicit and explicit measures; (1) theoretical developments inspired by these dissociations; and (5) research that used implicit measures to address domain-specific and applied questions. We conclude with a discussion of challenges and open questions that remain to be addressed, offering guidance for the next generation of research using implicit measures.