A biomarker for vascular calcification: shedding light on an unfinished story?
A biomarker for vascular calcification: shedding light on an unfinished story?
复制标题
血管钙化的生物标志物:揭示一个未完成的故事?
DOI:
10.1093/cvr/cvab071
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
10.8
通讯作者:
Demer,LindaL
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hsu,JeffreyJ;Tintut,Yin;Demer,LindaL
Vascular calcification (VC) is highly prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and particularly those with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis. 1 In this patient population, VC, especially coronary artery calcification, is a strong predictor of mortality. 2 Even in young adults, VC progresses, particularly with declining kidney function (eGFR< 60–75 mL/min/1.73 m2), 3 worsening albuminuria, 4 and longer duration of dialysis. 3 The adverse clinical outcomes associated with higher levels of VC include acute myocardial infarction, ischaemic cardiac events, left ventricular hypertrophy, and sudden death. 4 In addition to traditional risk factors for VC, patients with CKD have disordered mineral metabolism, particularly hyperphosphataemia, resulting from impaired renal clearance, secondary hyperparathyroidism, alterations in vitamin D status, and abnormal bone metabolism. 5 Increased levels of serum phosphate, a known contributor to ectopic calcification, and reduced levels of calcification inhibitors, including fetuin-A, osteocalcin, osteoprotegerin, matrix GLA protein, and pyrophosphate, all create a milieu for trans-differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and unopposed mineralization of the extracellular matrix. 6 Towler has aptly termed this a ‘perfect storm’for mineralization. VC is currently identified using non-invasive imaging modalities, such as chest radiography and computed tomography (CT), or invasive techniques, such as intravascular ultrasound of the coronary arteries. While VC is often incidentally found on such studies, there has been a marked rise in the use of cardiac CT as a screening test to calculate a coronary artery calcium (CAC) score, owing to the strong association of higher CAC scores with worse prognoses. These imaging modalities are widely used, yet factors such as cost, availability, and radiation exposure may limit their accessibility to some patients. Accordingly, the identification of circulating biomarkers in the blood that can identify the presence of VC could offer a more appealing alternative. In this issue, using meticulous, step-wise miRNA and transcriptomic profiling, Chao et al. 7 identified a novel panel of circulating serum biomarkers for diagnosing the presence and severity of uraemic VC in patients with ESRD. The researchers used miRNA and mRNA microarrays of samples from uraemic cell culture and rodent models to search for differentially regulated miRNAs. Their initial analysis identified 122 down-regulated and 119 up-regulated miRNAs with increasing levels of VC. Using a bioinformatics-assisted approach that sorted for matching trends with target genes, they narrowed the miRNA biomarker candidates to nine miRNAs that were down-regulated with VC. These nine candidates were further validated experimentally using the original in vitro and in vivo models, as well as an additional ex vivo VC model, which further narrowed their candidates to four miRNAs (miR-10b-5p, miR-195, miR125b-2-3p, and miR-378a-3p) and one mRNA (SULF1). Finally, they measured circulating levels of these candidates in two cohorts of patients: dialysis-dependent patients with ESRD and non-dialysisdependent patients with CKD. In both cohorts, they found that VC severity correlated with decreased serum levels of miR-125b-2-3p and mir-378a-3p, whereas it correlated with increased levels of SULF1, a potential target of miR-378a-3p. In their regression analyses, they conclude that the miRNA/mRNA pair—miR-378a-30/SULF1—in combination with traditional clinical features appears to be useful for improved diagnosis and classification of severity of uraemic VC in patients with CKD/ESRD. The authors …