Comparison of Additive Manufactured and Conventional 316L Stainless Steels
Comparison of Additive Manufactured and Conventional 316L Stainless Steels
复制标题
DOI:
10.1017/s143192761500313x
复制
发表时间:
2015-08
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
Joven J.H. Lim;A. R. C. Malheiros;G. Bertali;C. Long;P. Freyer;M. G. Burke
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Joven J.H. Lim;A. R. C. Malheiros;G. Bertali;C. Long;P. Freyer;M. G. Burke
J. J. H. Lim, A. R. C. Malheiros, G. Bertali, C. J. Long, P. D. Freyer and M. G. Burke 1. Material Performance Centre, School of Materials, University of Manchester, Manchester (UK) 2 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, Hopkins, SC 29061 (USA) 3 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, Pittsburgh, PA 15235 (USA) Additive manufacturing (AM) technology provides a high degree of design freedom and is capable of producing near-net-shape sophisticated components with tailored properties [1, 2]. These unique properties provide savings in terms of raw material costs and a simplified manufacturing chain process. Thus, the prospect of microstructural design through AM is extremely attractive for manufacturing structural components for nuclear power plants. However, with this level of control, process-induced imperfections, such as porosity [3], residual stress [4] and preferential grain growth orientation [5], need to be addressed before AM can be used for ‘real’ engineering applications. In order to overcome these imperfections, it is crucial to understand the connection between microstructure, processing and mechanical properties of AM materials.