Chunking during serial learning by a pigeon: I. Basic evidence.
Chunking during serial learning by a pigeon: I. Basic evidence.
复制标题
鸽子连续学习过程中的分块：I. 基本证据。
DOI：
10.1037//0097-7403.17.1.81
复制
发表时间：
1991
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Terrace,HS
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Terrace,HS
通过比较不同类型的列表上的性能，展示了鸽子的组块。实验1表明，第II组和第IV组(他们分别学习了分离颜色和非彩色几何形状的列表：A→B→C→D‘→E’和A→B→C→D→E‘)执行列表的速度比第I组(他们学习了同质的颜色列表：A→B→C→D→E)或组II和III(他们学习了由未分离的颜色和形式组成的列表：分别是A→B’→C→D‘→E和A→B→C’→D→E)更快。实验2表明，II和IV组比I、III和V组更能容忍列表的中断。I、III和V组的反应准确率随着中断的持续时间和序列中发生中断的时间点而降低。第二组的表现没有受到中断的影响；第四组受到的影响最小。这些结果表明，组II和组IV将他们的列表组织成有序的块。
Chunking by pigeons was demonstrated by comparing performance on different types of lists. Experiment 1 showed that Groups II and IV (who learned lists in which colors and achromatic geometric forms were segregated: A→ B→ C→ D′→ E′ and A→ B→ C→ D→ E′, respectively) executed lists more rapidly than did Group I (who learned a homogeneous list of colors: A→ B→ C→ D→ E) or Groups II and III (who learned lists consisting of unsegregated colors and forms: A→ B′→ C→ D′→ E and A→ B→ C′→ D→ E, respectively). Experiment 2 showed that Groups II and IV tolerated interruptions of the list better than did Groups I, III, and V. The accuracy of responding of Groups I, III, and V decreased as a function of the duration of the interruption and the point in the sequence at which it occurred. The performance of Group II was unaffected by interruptions; Group IV was minimally affected. These results indicate that Groups II and IV organized their lists as ordered chunks.