The representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effects
The representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effects
复制标题
第三人的代表及其对人案效应的影响
DOI：
10.1007/s11049-006-9017-2
复制
发表时间：
2007
影响因子：
1.3
通讯作者：
A. Nevins
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Nevins
在模拟人-案约束（PCC）的影响时，一个常见的说法是第三人称“不是人”。然而，虽然这种说法在句法上确实有效，但它在形态学上产生了问题。例如，在西班牙语中描述众所周知的“虚假的se效应”，如果不提到第三人称，就无法完成。灵感来自于音位学中出现的未充分说明的替代方案（例如，Calabrese，1995），提出了一个修正的特征系统，其中句法一致性可以相对于某些值的特征，特别是，对比和标记值。PCC效应的变化范围被证明是出现作为一个探测头上允许的参数选项的结果，而表示的人保持不变的语法和跨语言的模块。
In modeling the effects of the Person-Case Constraint (PCC), a common claim is that 3rd person “is not a person”. However, while this claim does work in the syntax, it creates problems in the morphology. For example, characterizing the well-known “spurious se effect” in Spanish simply cannot be done without reference to 3rd person. Inspired by alternatives to underspecification that have emerged in phonology (e.g., Calabrese, 1995), a revised featural system is proposed, whereby syntactic agreement may be relativized to certain values of a feature, in particular, the contrastive and marked values. The range of variation in PCC effects is shown to emerge as a consequence of the parametric options allowed on a Probing head, whereas the representation of person remains constant across modules of the grammar and across languages.