Who Needs the Undercommons? Refuge and Resistance in Public High Schools
Who Needs the Undercommons? Refuge and Resistance in Public High Schools
复制标题
谁需要地下公地？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
G. Greer
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. Greer
本文是一个理论讨论的地下：逃亡计划和黑色的研究（哈尼和莫滕，2013年）作为一个贡献，在公立学校的批判性教育。在这里，下公地作为一种认识手段，或者说是一种与公共教育相关的观察和认知方式。这一手段的作用是建立一种对学生生存和积极行为的欣赏观点，并将教育政策作为一种潜在的排斥学生的机制。我认为，学校的包容性做法与不被承认的排斥性做法并存。下公地被用作一个透镜，使这种剥夺公民权的机制显而易见。在此，我主张扩大包容性教育，除了对特定人口群体提供有针对性的支持外，还必须关注更普遍的剥夺公民权做法。
This paper is a theoretical discussion of The Undercommons: Fugitive Planning and Black Study (Harney & Moten, 2013) as a contribution to critical education in public schools. The undercommons serves here as an epistemic device, or a way of seeing and knowing, in relation to public education. The function of this device is to establish an appreciative view of student survival and activist behaviours and to centre educational policy as a potential mechanism of student exclusion. I propose that the practice of inclusion in schools coexists with unacknowledged operations of exclusion. The undercommons is employed as a lens to make such mechanisms of disenfranchisement apparent. I advocate here for an extension of inclusive education which, in addition to targeted supports for particular demographic groups, must concern itself with more general practices of disenfranchisement.