An evaluation of the predictive performance and mapping power of the BayesR model for genomic prediction.
An evaluation of the predictive performance and mapping power of the BayesR model for genomic prediction.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1093/g3journal/jkab225
复制
发表时间:
2021-10-19
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Croiseau P
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mollandin F;Rau A;Croiseau P
Technological advances and decreasing costs have led to the rise of increasingly dense genotyping data, making feasible the identification of potential causal markers. Custom genotyping chips, which combine medium-density genotypes with a custom genotype panel, can capitalize on these candidates to potentially yield improved accuracy and interpretability in genomic prediction. A particularly promising model to this end is BayesR, which divides markers into four effect size classes. BayesR has been shown to yield accurate predictions and promise for quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping in real data applications, but an extensive benchmarking in simulated data is currently lacking. Based on a set of real genotypes, we generated simulated data under a variety of genetic architectures and phenotype heritabilities, and we evaluated the impact of excluding or including causal markers among the genotypes. We define several statistical criteria for QTL mapping, including several based on sliding windows to account for linkage disequilibrium (LD). We compare and contrast these statistics and their ability to accurately prioritize known causal markers. Overall, we confirm the strong predictive performance for BayesR in moderately to highly heritable traits, particularly for 50k custom data. In cases of low heritability or weak LD with the causal marker in 50k genotypes, QTL mapping is a challenge, regardless of the criterion used. BayesR is a promising approach to simultaneously obtain accurate predictions and interpretable classifications of SNPs into effect size classes. We illustrated the performance of BayesR in a variety of simulation scenarios, and compared the advantages and limitations of each.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
30.8
作者:
Marchini, Jonathan;Howie, Bryan;Donnelly, Peter
通讯作者:
Donnelly, Peter
影响因子:
4.5
作者:
Moser G;Lee SH;Hayes BJ;Goddard ME;Wray NR;Visscher PM
通讯作者:
Visscher PM
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
MacLeod IM;Bowman PJ;Vander Jagt CJ;Haile-Mariam M;Kemper KE;Chamberlain AJ;Schrooten C;Hayes BJ;Goddard ME
通讯作者:
Goddard ME
影响因子:
3.5
作者:
Brondum, R. F.;Su, G.;Lund, M. S.
通讯作者:
Lund, M. S.
DOI:
10.1186/s12711-016-0259-0
发表时间:
2016-11-04
期刊:
Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE
影响因子:
--
作者:
van den Berg I;Boichard D;Lund MS
通讯作者:
Lund MS