Changes in biodiversity and trade-offs among ecosystem services, stakeholders, and components of well-being: the contribution of the International Long-Term Ecological Research network (ILTER) to Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS)
Changes in biodiversity and trade-offs among ecosystem services, stakeholders, and components of well-being: the contribution of the International Long-Term Ecological Research network (ILTER) to Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS)
复制标题
生物多样性的变化以及生态系统服务、利益相关者和福祉组成部分之间的权衡：国际长期生态研究网络（ILTER）对生态系统变化与社会计划（PECS）的贡献
DOI：
10.5751/es-08587-210331
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
A. Vădineanu
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Maass;P. Balvanera;P. Bourgeron;M. Equihua;J. Baudry;J. Dick;M. Forsius;Ľ. Halada;K. Krauze;M. Nakaoka;Daniel E. Orenstein;T. Parr;C. Redman;R. Rozzi;M. Santos‐Reis;A. Swemmer;A. Vădineanu
国际长期生态研究网络包括在40个国家进行实地研究的600多个科学团体。其使命包括增进对全球生态系统的了解，并为解决全球范围内当前和未来的环境问题提供信息。国际土地资源和环境研究所网络涵盖广泛的社会生态条件，并与生态系统变化与社会方案的目标和方法保持一致。我们的目标是检查和发展的概念基础，拟议的ILTER和佩奇之间的合作。我们描述了几个对比LTER站点为基础的研究小组的协调努力有助于了解政策和技术如何推动或远离生态系统服务的可持续提供。这项工作基于三个原则：跨学科研究;跨尺度的相互作用和后续动态;以及生态管理导向。总体目标是设计管理做法，考虑到使用和保护生态系统之间的权衡，以实现更可持续的解决方案。为此，我们提出了一个概念性的方法，连接生态系统的完整性，生态系统服务和利益相关者的福祉，并作为一种方式来分析权衡生态系统服务固有的不同管理方案。我们还概述了我们的方法，其中包括：（一）监测和综合活动的空间和时间的趋势和变化，在每个网站和记录跨尺度的相互作用;（二）开发分析工具的整合;（三）促进跨网站的比较;和（四）开发概念工具，设计适当的政策和管理干预措施，以处理权衡。最后，我们强调的异质性，在社会生态环境中遇到的一个子集的15 ILTER网站。这些研究案例的多样性足以提供一个广泛的、具有鲜明对比的生态系统的横截面，这些生态系统具有不同的生态系统转换政策和管理驱动因素;不同的生物多样性变化趋势;不同的利益攸关方对生态系统服务的偏好;以及福祉问题的不同组成部分。
The International Long-Term Ecological Research (ILTER) network comprises > 600 scientific groups conducting site-based research within 40 countries. Its mission includes improving the understanding of global ecosystems and informs solutions to current and future environmental problems at the global scales. The ILTER network covers a wide range of social-ecological conditions and is aligned with the Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS) goals and approach. Our aim is to examine and develop the conceptual basis for proposed collaboration between ILTER and PECS. We describe how a coordinated effort of several contrasting LTER site-based research groups contributes to the understanding of how policies and technologies drive either toward or away from the sustainable delivery of ecosystem services. This effort is based on three tenets: transdisciplinary research; cross-scale interactions and subsequent dynamics; and an ecological stewardship orientation. The overarching goal is to design management practices taking into account trade-offs between using and conserving ecosystems toward more sustainable solutions. To that end, we propose a conceptual approach linking ecosystem integrity, ecosystem services, and stakeholder well-being, and as a way to analyze trade-offs among ecosystem services inherent in diverse management options. We also outline our methodological approach that includes: (i) monitoring and synthesis activities following spatial and temporal trends and changes on each site and by documenting cross-scale interactions; (ii) developing analytical tools for integration; (iii) promoting trans-site comparison; and (iv) developing conceptual tools to design adequate policies and management interventions to deal with trade-offs. Finally, we highlight the heterogeneity in the social-ecological setting encountered in a subset of 15 ILTER sites. These study cases are diverse enough to provide a broad cross-section of contrasting ecosystems with different policy and management drivers of ecosystem conversion; distinct trends of biodiversity change; different stakeholders’ preferences for ecosystem services; and diverse components of well-being issues.
生态系统服务和相关概念
影响因子：
1.7
作者：
Dick J
通讯作者：
Dick J
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Daw, Tim;Brown, Katrina;Pomeroy, Robert
通讯作者：
Pomeroy, Robert