Multi‐Ethnic Parties in Bosnia‐Herzegovina: Naša Stranka and the Paradoxes of Postethnic Politics
Multi‐Ethnic Parties in Bosnia‐Herzegovina: Naša Stranka and the Paradoxes of Postethnic Politics
复制标题
波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的多民族政党：纳萨·斯特兰卡与后民族政治的悖论
DOI：
10.1111/j.1754-9469.2011.01134.x
复制
发表时间：
2011
影响因子：
0.6
通讯作者：
Heleen Touquet
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Heleen Touquet
在具有高度种族化国家结构的国家中，跨越种族界限的政治动员在多大程度上是可能的？本文探讨了波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的活动家在寻求发展综合性话语作为政治行动基础时遇到的机遇和障碍。本文的第一部分重点关注多民族政党在严重分裂的社会中的作用。第二部分针对波斯尼亚多民族政党所面临的障碍提出了不同的想法，重点关注由民间社会行动者建立的政党 Nasa Stranka 的案例。有两个结论可以得出。首先，尽管离心民族主义似乎在最高政治层面占主导地位，但波斯尼亚也有民间社会行动者参与一体化的政治动员。其次，这些行动者面临的困难超出了人们经常提到的宪政国家结构倾向于具体化民族身份的问题。
To what extent is political mobilisation across ethnic boundaries possible in states with highly ethnicised state structures? This article explores the opportunities and obstacles that activists in Bosnia-Herzegovina meet when they seek to develop integrative discourses as a basis for political action. The first part of the article focuses on the role of multi-ethnic parties in deeply divided societies. The second part develops alternative ideas on the obstacles facing multi-ethnic parties in Bosnia, focusing on the case of Nasa Stranka, a political party that was established by civil society actors. There are two conclusions to be drawn. First, despite the centrifugal nationalisms that seem to dominate the top political level, there are civil society actors in Bosnia who engage in integrative political mobilisation. Second, these actors face difficulties that go beyond the often-cited problem of the tendency of the constitutional state structure to reify ethnic identities.