Social phobia: comments on the viability and validity of an analogue research strategy and British norms for the Fear of Negative Evaluation Questionnaire
Social phobia: comments on the viability and validity of an analogue research strategy and British norms for the Fear of Negative Evaluation Questionnaire
复制标题
社交恐惧症：对模拟研究策略的可行性和有效性的评论以及英国恐惧负面评估问卷的规范
DOI：
10.1017/s1352465801004039
复制
发表时间：
2001
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
D. Clark
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lusia L. Stopa;D. Clark
本文讨论了一个类似的研究设计的可行性，通过比较个人得分高，低的恐惧消极评价量表（FNE：沃森和朋友，1969）的研究在社交恐惧症的关键过程。研究表明，在区分社交恐惧症患者与对照组以及高FNE志愿者与低FNE志愿者的过程中具有显着的一致性。不幸的是，所有现有的FNE规范都是基于北美人口。本文件介绍了英国学生的规范，并建议可能的截止点，为类似的研究定义组。类比策略的优势包括新范例的快速试验和使用需要大量样本的更复杂的实验设计。模拟研究的局限性也被强调。
This paper discusses the viability of an analogue research design for studying key processes in social phobia by comparing individuals who score high and low on the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (FNE: Watson & Friend, 1969). Research indicates remarkable consistency in the processes that distinguish patients with social phobia from controls and high FNE volunteers from low FNE volunteers. Unfortunately, all existing FNE norms are based on North American populations. The present paper presents British student norms and suggests possible cut-off points for defining groups for analogue research. Advantages of the analogue strategy include rapid piloting of new paradigms and the use of more complex experimental designs that require substantial sample sizes. Limitations of analogue research are also highlighted.