Ethical standards as an independent variable in psychological research.
Ethical standards as an independent variable in psychological research.
复制标题
道德标准作为心理学研究中的自变量。
DOI：
10.1037/h0034208
复制
发表时间：
1973
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Thomas Schwartz
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Resnick;Thomas Schwartz
讨论了最近的建议有关心理学研究的伦理标准。研究人员进行了一个简单的、典型的语言条件反射实验，在这个实验中，当S以”我”或”我们“开始一个句子时，E说”好”。14名男大学生被选入非伦理组，并按照现行程序进行：他们只被告知实验涉及“造句”。“14个S的伦理组是在充分披露实验目的和假设的条件下选择和运行的。在完全知情同意的情况下，允许受试者参与或不参与。非道德组的被试在条件反射中表现出积极的方向，而道德组的被试在条件反射中表现出消极的方向（p<. 001）。对伦理S的逆条件反射进行了解释。它的结论是，一旦paramethodological的要求下，收集数据被改变，结果的解释变得不可能。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
Discusses recent proposals concerning ethical standards for psychological research. An experiment was conducted using a simple, typical verbal conditioning task in which the E said" good" when the S began a sentence with either" I" or" we." The nonethical group of 14 male undergraduates was selected and run under current procedures: they were informed only that the experiment involved" sentence construction." The ethical group of 14 Ss was selected and run under conditions of full disclosure of the experiment's purpose and hypotheses. Ss were allowed to participate or not under complete informed consent. Ss in the nonethical group significantly conditioned in a positive direction, while those in the ethical group conditioned in a negative direction (p<. 001). Explanations for the reversed conditioning of the ethical Ss are presented. It is concluded that once the paramethodological requirements under which data are collected are altered, interpretation of results becomes impossible.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)