Social citizenship rights and social insurance replacement rate validity: pitfalls and possibilities
Social citizenship rights and social insurance replacement rate validity: pitfalls and possibilities
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/13501763.2013.822907
复制
发表时间：
2013-10-01
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
Palme, Joakim
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ferrarini, Tommy;Nelson, Kenneth;Palme, Joakim
对福利国家的比较分析因基于权利的社会供给衡量而得到了极大的推进。社会保险替代率在这方面占有突出地位。显然，人们对更替率的有效性及其在不同数据集之间的可比性存在相当大的混淆。本研究的目的是在福利国家的比较分析中勾勒出一个精炼的制度视角，重点关注社会公民权的特征。我们发现，来自不同数据集的社会保险替代率在其政策分析的基本理论框架上有所不同，因此可以从不同方面来理解福利国家如何在丧失工作能力期间保障公民的生计。因此，仅根据更替率点估计数分析有效性是误导性的。我们表明，密切关注社会公民权利和社会公民指标计划（SCIP）的方案设计进行因果福利国家分析的巨大潜力。
The comparative analysis of welfare states has been greatly advanced by rights-based measurements of social provisions. Social insurance replacement rates have figured prominently here. Apparently, there is considerable confusion about the validity of replacement rates and their comparability across different datasets. The purpose of this study is to outline a refined institutional perspective in the comparative analysis of welfare states focusing on the character of social citizenship rights. We show that social insurance replacement rates from different datasets differ in their underlying theoretical framework for policy analysis and therefore capture different aspects of how welfare states secure the livelihood of citizens in periods of work incapacity. Analysing validity solely on the basis of replacement rate point estimates is therefore misleading. We show that the close focus on social citizenship rights and programmatic design in the Social Citizenship Indicator Programme (SCIP) carries great potential for causal welfare state analysis.