(2961) Proposal to conserve Bellucia , nom. cons., against the additional names Myriaspora and Loreya ( Melastomataceae : Henrietteeae )
(2961) Proposal to conserve Bellucia , nom. cons., against the additional names Myriaspora and Loreya ( Melastomataceae : Henrietteeae )
复制标题
(2961) 保护贝卢西亚的提案,名义。
DOI:
10.1002/tax.12969
复制
发表时间:
2023
期刊:
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
Stone, Robert Douglas
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Penneys, Darin S.;Michelangeli, Fabián A.;Judd, Walter S.;Almeda, Frank;Stone, Robert Douglas
The woody Neotropical genus Bellucia Neck. ex Raf.(Sylva Tellur.: 92. 1838) is typified by B. nervosa Raf.(lc: 93), an illegitimate name (≡ Blakea quinquenervia Aubl., Hist. Pl. Guiane 1:525, t. 210. 1775) and a taxonomic synonym of B. grossularioides (L.) Triana (in Trans. Linn. Soc. London 28: 141. 1872)(Melastoma grossularioides L., Sp. Pl.: 390. 1753). The genus comprises 22 species as presently circumscribed (Judd & Penneys in Goldenberg & al., Syst. Evol. Ecol. Melastomataceae: 219-234. 2022). Because Necker’s Elementa botanica (1790) is a suppressed work under Art. 34 of the ICN (Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018), the generic name Bellucia, although first appearing in Necker (Elem. Bot. 2: 143. 1790), was not validly published until taken up by Rafinesque (lc). Morphological character analyses (Judd & al. in Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 76: 476-495. 1989; Renner in Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 50. 1989) have found that Myriaspora DC.(Prodr. 3: 165. 1828) and Bellucia Neck. ex Raf.(lc) as previously circumscribed (Renner, lc 1989) are phylogenetically nested within Loreya DC.(lc: 178). In other words, Loreya is most likely paraphyletic if its circumscription excludes members of the other two genera. Penneys & al.(in Syst. Bot. 35: 783-800. 2010) proposed treating Myriaspora and Loreya as taxonomic synonyms of an expanded Bellucia and accordingly published nine new combinations at species rank. This