(2961) Proposal to conserve Bellucia , nom. cons., against the additional names Myriaspora and Loreya ( Melastomataceae : Henrietteeae )

(2961) Proposal to conserve Bellucia , nom. cons., against the additional names Myriaspora and Loreya ( Melastomataceae : Henrietteeae )
复制标题

(2961) 保护贝卢西亚的提案,名义。

DOI:
10.1002/tax.12969
复制
发表时间:
2023
期刊:
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
Stone, Robert Douglas
Stone, Robert Douglas
中科院分区:
生物学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Penneys, Darin S.;Michelangeli, Fabián A.;Judd, Walter S.;Almeda, Frank;Stone, Robert Douglas

文献摘要

相似文献

新热带木本属Bellucia Neck。前拉夫。(西尔瓦·泰卢尔:92. 1838年)是典型的B。显脉草(lc:93),一个不合法的名字(Blakea quinquenervia Aubl.,Hist. Pl. Guiane 1:525,t. 210. 1775)和B的分类学同义词。grossularioides(L.)Triana(in Trans. Linn. Soc.伦敦28:141. 1872)(Mecula grossularioides L.,特殊植物:390. 1753年)。该属包括22个物种,目前被限制(贾德和彭尼在戈登伯格等人,系统进化Ecol. Mexilataceae:219-234. 2022年)。因为内克尔的《植物元素》(1790年)是ICN第34条规定的压制作品(Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018年),通用名称贝卢西亚,虽然第一次出现在内克尔(元素。两点一百四十三分1790年),没有有效出版,直到采取了Rafinesque(立法会)。形态特征分析(Judd & al. in Ann.密苏里州Bot.加德76:476-495。1989年; Renner在Mem.纽约Bot.加德50. 1989年)发现,Myriaspora DC。(产品编号:三点一百六十五分。1828年)和贝卢西亚颈。前拉夫。(lc)如先前所限定的(Renner,lc 1989),它们在Loreya DC内遗传嵌套。(lc:178)。换句话说,如果Loreya的界限排除了其他两个属的成员,那么Loreya最有可能是并系的。Penneys & al. (in系统机器人。35:783-800。2010年)提出将Myriaspora和Loreya作为扩展Bellucia的分类学同义词,并相应地在种级上发表了9个新组合。这
The woody Neotropical genus Bellucia Neck. ex Raf.(Sylva Tellur.: 92. 1838) is typified by B. nervosa Raf.(lc: 93), an illegitimate name (≡ Blakea quinquenervia Aubl., Hist. Pl. Guiane 1:525, t. 210. 1775) and a taxonomic synonym of B. grossularioides (L.) Triana (in Trans. Linn. Soc. London 28: 141. 1872)(Melastoma grossularioides L., Sp. Pl.: 390. 1753). The genus comprises 22 species as presently circumscribed (Judd & Penneys in Goldenberg & al., Syst. Evol. Ecol. Melastomataceae: 219-234. 2022). Because Necker’s Elementa botanica (1790) is a suppressed work under Art. 34 of the ICN (Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018), the generic name Bellucia, although first appearing in Necker (Elem. Bot. 2: 143. 1790), was not validly published until taken up by Rafinesque (lc). Morphological character analyses (Judd & al. in Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 76: 476-495. 1989; Renner in Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 50. 1989) have found that Myriaspora DC.(Prodr. 3: 165. 1828) and Bellucia Neck. ex Raf.(lc) as previously circumscribed (Renner, lc 1989) are phylogenetically nested within Loreya DC.(lc: 178). In other words, Loreya is most likely paraphyletic if its circumscription excludes members of the other two genera. Penneys & al.(in Syst. Bot. 35: 783-800. 2010) proposed treating Myriaspora and Loreya as taxonomic synonyms of an expanded Bellucia and accordingly published nine new combinations at species rank. This