Do noncontingent vouchers increase drug use?
Do noncontingent vouchers increase drug use?
复制标题
非或有券会增加毒品使用吗？
DOI：
10.1037/1064-1297.11.3.195
复制
发表时间：
2003
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
Preston,KenzieL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Schroeder,JenniferR;Gupman,AnneE;Epstein,DavidH;Umbricht,Annie;Preston,KenzieL
从2个应急管理试验的数据，针对阿片类药物或可卡因的使用，被用来调查是否noncontingent券无意中加强药物使用。对照组在每项试验中收到的非偶然券的价值和频率相匹配的实验组，但独立的尿液分析。研究人员每周提供三次，持续8周（阿片类药物）或12周（可卡因）。剂量反应和时间相关性的非特遣队凭单收据与药物阳性尿液进行了评估。当药物阳性与随后使用药物的风险无关时，药物使用与非偶然性凭证交付和非偶然性凭证接收的频率无关，但有一个例外：可卡因研究中的可卡因使用（相对风险= 1.05，95%置信区间：1.01-1.09）。总的来说，结果并不表明非偶然的凭单收据和增加药物使用之间的因果关系。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2017阿帕，保留所有权利）
Data from 2 contingency management trials, targeting opiate or cocaine use, were used to investigate whether noncontingent vouchers inadvertently reinforce drug use. The control group in each trial received noncontingent vouchers matched in value and frequency to those received by experimental groups, but independent of urinalysis. Vouchers were offered thrice weekly for 8 weeks (opiates) or 12 weeks (cocaine). Both dose-response and temporal associations of noncontingent voucher receipt with drug-positive urines were assessed. Drug use was unrelated to frequency of noncontingent voucher delivery and noncontingent voucher receipt when being drug positive was unassociated with risk of subsequent drug use, with one exception: cocaine use in the cocaine study (relative risk= 1.05, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.09). Overall, results do not indicate a causal relationship between noncontingent voucher receipt and increased drug use.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved)