Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire
Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/s0005-7916(00)00012-4
复制
发表时间：
2000-06-01
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Borkovec, TD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Devilly, GJ;Borkovec, TD
本研究评估的心理测量学属性的可信度/期望问卷，一个快速和易于管理的规模，用于测量治疗的期望值和合理的可信度，用于临床结果的研究。结果表明，这份问卷得出的两个预测因素（认知为基础的可信度和相对更情感为基础的期望），这些因素在不同的人群是稳定的。此外，该问卷表现出较高的内部一致性，每个因素和良好的重测信度。预期因素预测结果的一些措施，而可信度因素无关的结果。问卷附在论文之后，但作者在使用量表时强调照顾，在问卷管理过程中，参与者看到两个部分-一个与思维有关，一个与感觉有关。然而，研究人员需要注意的是，这两个因素并不属于这些问题。相反，可信度来自前三个思考问题，而期望来自第四个思考问题和两个感觉问题。(C)2000爱思唯尔科技有限公司版权所有。
The present research evaluated the psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire, a quick and easy-to-administer scale for measuring treatment expectancy and rationale credibility for use in clinical outcome studies. The results suggested that this questionnaire derives the two predicted factors (cognitively based credibility and relatively more affectively based expectancy) and that these factors are stable across different populations. Furthermore, the questionnaire demonstrated high internal consistency within each factor and good test-retest reliability. The expectancy factor predicted outcome on some measures, whereas the credibility factor was unrelated to outcome. The questionnaire is appended to the paper, yet the authors stress care when utilizing the scale, During the administration of the questionnaire, the participant sees two sections - one related to thinking and one related to feeling. However, the researcher needs to be aware that the 2 factors derived are not grouped into those questions. Instead credibility was found to be derived from the first three think questions and expectancy was derived from the fourth think question and the two feel questions. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.