5 STUDIES TESTING 2 NEW EGOISTIC ALTERNATIVES TO THE EMPATHY ALTRUISM HYPOTHESIS
5 STUDIES TESTING 2 NEW EGOISTIC ALTERNATIVES TO THE EMPATHY ALTRUISM HYPOTHESIS
复制标题
DOI:
10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.52
复制
发表时间:
1988-07-01
影响因子:
7.6
通讯作者:
GRIFFITT, C
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
BATSON, CD;DYCK, JL;GRIFFITT, C
The empathy-altruism hypothesis claims that prosocial motivation associated with feeling empathy for a person in need is directed toward the ultimate goal of benefiting that person, not toward some subtle form of self-benefit. We explored two new egoistic alternatives to this hypothesis. The empathy-specific reward hypothesis proposes that the prosocial motivation associated with empathy is directed toward the goal of obtaining social or self-rewards (ie, praise, honor, and pride). The empathy-specific punishment hypothesis proposes that this motivation is directed toward the goal of avoiding social or self-punishment (ie, censure, guilt, and shame). Study 1 provided an initial test of the empathy-specific reward hypothesis. Studies 2 through 4 used three procedures to test the empathy-specific punishment hypothesis. In Study 5, a Stroop procedure was used to assess the role of reward-relevant, punishment-relevant, and victim-relevant cognitions in mediating the empathy-helping relationship. Results of these five studies did not support either the empathy-specific reward or the empathy-specific punishment hypothesis. Instead, results of each supported the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Evidence that empathic emotion evokes altruistic motivation continues to mount.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)