The Geographies of Industrialised Finance: Probing the Global Production Networks of Asset Management
The Geographies of Industrialised Finance: Probing the Global Production Networks of Asset Management
复制标题
工业化金融的地理：探索资产管理的全球生产网络
DOI：
10.1111/gec3.12256
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
Sabine Dörry
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sabine Dörry
当代金融在其分工和空间组织上高度工业化。本文以资产管理行业为例，将全球生产网络(GPN)框架应用于基本上被忽视的金融“生产”领域。虽然承认GPN在经济全球化组织中对跨境关系的逐步概念化，但本文批判性地与这一概念的三个核心分析单位接触。首先，它挑战了关于投机金融活动的“价值”这一有些误导的定义。其次，它认为，复杂的、往往不透明的金融产品是金融生产中认识性增强的结果，这需要将对嵌入性的概念和经验关注转移到定义知识的回路上。第三，它通过强调私人承包在一些最复杂的金融GPN中的激增，对治理形式的整齐类型提出了质疑。通过对金融学的探讨，本文丰富了GPN案例研究的研究组合，并对其一些核心分析范畴的表述提出了质疑。本文讨论的全球化和金融化金融是如何组织和协调的，这种更全面的方法提供了一种富有成效的替代方案，取代了金融研究中流行的新古典计量经济学理解。
Contemporary finance is highly industrialised in its division of labour and spatial organisation. Using the example of the asset management industry, this article applies the Global Production Network (GPN) framework to the largely disregarded ‘production’ of finance. Whereas acknowledging the GPN's progressive conceptualisation of cross-boundary relationalities in the organisation of economic globalisation, this article critically engages with three of the concept's core analytical units. First, it challenges the somewhat misleading definition of ‘value’ with regard to speculative financial activities. Second, it argues that the complex, often opaque financial products are outcomes of the increased epistemic nature in the production of finance, which requires a shift in the conceptual and empirical attention of embeddedness towards the defining circuits of knowledge. Third, it contests the neat typology of governance forms by highlighting the proliferation of private contracting in some of the most complex financial GPNs. By probing finance, the article enriches the GPN research portfolio of case studies and interrogates the formulation of some of its core analytical categories. It is further argued that this more holistic approach towards how globalised and financialised finance is organised and coordinated as discussed in this article provides a fruitful alternative to the prevailing neoclassical, econometric understanding in financial studies.
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Faulconbridge J
通讯作者：
Faulconbridge J