PM(10)/PM(2.5)/PM(1) data from a trichotomous sampler

PM(10)/PM(2.5)/PM(1) data from a trichotomous sampler
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/02786829608965401
复制
发表时间:
1996-10-01
影响因子:
5.2
通讯作者:
Marple, VA
Marple, VA
中科院分区:
环境科学与生态学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lundgren, DA;Hlaing, DN;Marple, VA

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

作为确定1 μ m或2.5 μ m是否是新的细颗粒物标准的更好选择的努力的一部分,Virgil A。明尼苏达大学的马普尔开发了一种高容量的颗粒物(PM(10)/PM(2.5)/PM(1))采样器。这些采样器中的两个被用来获得颗粒物(PM)的样品在位于亚利桑那州凤凰城,从1995年5月至1995年10月在一个网站。对所有过滤器样品进行了质量浓度分析,并对少数样品进行了元素和化学成分分析。测定PM(10)、PM(2.5)、PM(1)、PM(2.5-10)和PM(1-2.5)的相对分数。进行计算以评估粗模式和细模式气溶胶如何对中间尺寸范围做出贡献。结果表明,凤凰城的PM(10)的大部分是粗糙模式PM(风吹尘),这也是PM(2.5)的主要贡献者。
As part of an effort to determine whether 1 mu m or 2.5 mu m is the better choice for a new fine particulate matter standard, Professor Virgil A. Marple of the University of Minnesota developed a high volume trichotomous (PM(10)/PM(2.5)/PM(1)) sampler. Two of these samplers were used to obtain particulate matter (PM) samples at a site located in Phoenix, Arizona, from May 1995 through October 1995. All filter samples were analyzed for mass concentrations and a few for elemental and chemical compositions. Relative fractions were determined for PM(10), PM(2.5), PM(1), PM(2.5-10), and PM(1-2.5). Calculations were made to evaluate how coarse and fine mode aerosol contributed to the intermediate size range. Results indicated that most of the PM(10) in Phoenix was coarse mode PM (windblown dust), which was also a primary contributor to PM(2.5).