Denaturalizing the Environment: Dissensus and the Possibility of Radically Democratizing Discourses of Environmental Sustainability

Denaturalizing the Environment: Dissensus and the Possibility of Radically Democratizing Discourses of Environmental Sustainability
复制标题

环境非自然化:环境可持续性话语的分歧和激进民主化的可能性

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
6.1
通讯作者:
P. Bloom
P. Bloom
中科院分区:
管理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Charles Barthold;P. Bloom

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

这篇文章的目的是介绍异议的概念,作为一个重要的角度,使当前的组织话语的环境可持续发展更加彻底的民主。它提出了人类世作为一种社会自然化的力量,一个矛盾的承认人类的作用,在负面影响的环境,同时限制他们的机构,以解决这个问题,以那些兼容的市场意识形态。激进的民主理论有助于改变组织与环境的关系,但在这样做的过程中,有可能再现自我中心主义和父权制的价值观。相反,Dissensus强调需要“重新分配理智”,将组织视为一个不断改变和重新改变我们与世界的社会物质关系的空间。然而,它也提出了一个激进的民主政治伦理,要求企业生态保护环境,允许积极的异议,同时内部抵制制度权力结构,自然这些组织环境。本文,因此,旨在显示的意义,纠纷,以加强激进的民主,无论是在话语的环境可持续性,特别是更普遍的组织内。
The aim of this article is to introduce the concept of dissensus as an important perspective for making current organizational discourses of environmental sustainability more radically democratic. It presents the Anthropocene as a force for social naturalization—one that paradoxically acknowledges humanity’s role in negatively impacting the environment while restricting their agency to address this problem to those compatible with a market ideology. Radical democratic theories of agonism help to denaturalize the relation of organizations to the environment yet risk reproducing values of anthropocentrism and patriarchy in doing so. Dissensus, by contrast, emphasizes the need to ‘redistribute the sensible’, treating organizations as a space for continually denaturalizing and renaturalizing our socio-material relation with the world. Yet it also puts forward a radically democratic political ethics demanding that firms ecologically preserve the environment to allow for positive dissensus while internally resisting institutional power structures that naturalize these organizational environments. This paper, thus, seeks to show the significance of dissensus for enhancing radical democracy both in regards to discourses of environmental sustainability specifically and more generally within organizations.
DOI: 10.1215/9781478004462-019
发表时间: 2019-04
期刊: Current Biology
影响因子: 9.2
作者:
W. Laurance
通讯作者: W. Laurance
条形码本质:战略归化作为事物基因组排序的创新实践
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954x.2010.01916.x
发表时间: 2010
期刊: The Sociological Review
影响因子: --
作者:
Waterton C
通讯作者: Waterton C