PROTOTYPE MATCHING - A STRATEGY FOR SOCIAL DECISION-MAKING

PROTOTYPE MATCHING - A STRATEGY FOR SOCIAL DECISION-MAKING
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/0022-3514.48.3.575
复制
发表时间:
1985-01-01
影响因子:
7.6
通讯作者:
KIHLSTROM, JF
KIHLSTROM, JF
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
NIEDENTHAL, PM;CANTOR, N;KIHLSTROM, JF

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

116名大学生回答了一系列的问卷调查,而他们在选择住房的过程中,从7个可用的选择,为即将到来的秋季。问卷内容包括自我概念、住宅原型、住宅偏好、住宅选择目标等。学生还完成了自我监控量表。自我原型匹配策略的分析表明,大多数的S喜欢的类型的住房,他们的原型的“代表”居民最密切地匹配他们的自我认知。个体差异注意自我适应的情况下进行了观察。在Ss谁报告说,他们在住房选择任务的人际目标,那些谁报告说,许多人格特征(积极和消极的)是不真实的自我更系统地使用的自我原型匹配规则,这也是真实的低自我监测。无论是模式的个体差异,获得与实际目标的学生在住房决策。(39参考)(PsycINFO数据库记录(c)2016阿帕,保留所有权利)
116 college students responded to a series of questionnaires while they were in the process of selecting housing from a choice of 7 available options for the coming fall. Questionnaires concerned their self-concepts, housing prototypes, preferences in housing, and goals in housing selection. Ss also completed a self-monitoring scale. Analyses of the self-to-prototype matching strategy suggest that most Ss preferred the type of housing for which their prototype of the" representative" resident most closely matches their self-perceptions. Individual differences in attention to self-fit in situations were observed. Among Ss who reported that they had interpersonal goals in the housing selection task, those who reported that many personality characteristics (both positive and negative) were untrue of self were more systematic in their use of the self-to-prototype matching rule; this was also true of low self-monitors. Neither pattern of individual differences were obtained for Ss with practical goals in the housing decision.(39 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)