Assessment of the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy for primary cutaneous desmoplastic melanoma.
Assessment of the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy for primary cutaneous desmoplastic melanoma.
复制标题
评估前哨淋巴结活检对原发性皮肤促纤维增生性黑色素瘤的作用。
DOI:
10.1002/cncr.21635
复制
发表时间:
2006
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Gershenwald,JeffreyE
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pawlik,TimothyM;Ross,MerrickI;Prieto,VictorG;Ballo,MatthewT;Johnson,MarcellaM;Mansfield,PaulF;Lee,JeffreyE;Cormier,JaniceN;Gershenwald,JeffreyE
BACKGROUNDThe role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in the treatment of desmoplastic melanoma (DM) remains undefined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of SLNB for DM.METHODSIn all, 1850 patients with cutaneous melanoma underwent wide local excision and SLNB. Patients with DM were identified and stratified as ‘pure’ DM or ‘mixed’ DM (i.e., DM associated with at least one other common histologic subtype).RESULTSOf the 1850 patients, 65 (3.5%) had DM. Of these, 46 (70.8%) had pure DM and 19 (29.2%) had mixed DM. Patients with pure DM had a median tumor thickness of 3.5 mm and 6.5% were ulcerated. Compared with patients with pure DM, patients with either mixed DM or non‐DM (n= 1785) had thinner primary tumors (median, 1.7 mm and 1.5 mm, respectively, eachP< 0.001 vs. pure DM) that were more likely to be ulcerated (27.7% and 21.3%, respectively, eachP< 0.05 vs. pure DM). Although the incidence of a positive SLN was similar in patients with mixed DM (15.8%) and non‐DM (17.5%), patients with pure DM were less likely to have a positive SLN (2.2%) (eachP< 0.01 vs. non‐DM and mixed DM). At a median follow‐up of 2.9 years, no patient with pure DM had recurred.CONCLUSIONSDespite having thicker primary tumors, patients with pure DM have a lower incidence of positive SLNs compared with patients with non‐DM. Whereas the treatment approach for patients with mixed DM should be similar to that of other melanoma patients, patients with pure DM are unlikely to have metastatic disease in regional lymph nodes and SLNB may not be warranted. Cancer 2006. © 2006 American Cancer Society.