Towards an Analytical Framework of Science Communication Models
Towards an Analytical Framework of Science Communication Models
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/978-1-4020-8598-7_7
复制
发表时间：
2008-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Trench, Brian
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Trench, Brian
本章回顾了科学传播界对公众科技传播模式的讨论。它质疑的说法，有一个大规模的转变，从“赤字模式”的沟通，以“对话模式”，它表明了生存的赤字模式沿着的模糊性，该模式。类似的讨论，在相关领域的沟通，包括对话的批判，简要概述。作者概述了PCST方法的复杂环境，认为通常被认为是反对的通信模式实际上可以共存时，选择是明确的。为了帮助这一过程，作者提出了一个分析框架的沟通模式的基础上赤字，对话和参与，包括每一个的变化。
This chapter reviews the discussion in science communication circles of models for public communication of science and technology (PCST). It questions the claim that there has been a large-scale shift from a 'deficit model' of communication to a 'dialogue model', and it demonstrates the survival of the deficit model along with the ambiguities of that model. Similar discussions in related fields of communication, including the critique of dialogue, are briefly sketched. Outlining the complex circumstances governing approaches to PCST, the author argues that communications models often perceived to be opposed can, in fact, coexist when the choices are made explicit. To aid this process, the author proposes an analytical framework of communication models based on deficit, dialogue and participation, including variations on each.