Distribution and Redistribution: The Shadow of the Nineteenth Century

Distribution and Redistribution: The Shadow of the Nineteenth Century
复制标题

分配与再分配:十九世纪的阴影

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2009
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
D. Soskice
D. Soskice
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Torben Iversen;D. Soskice

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

作者提出了一种替代权力资源理论的方法来研究分配和再分配。虽然他们同意党派之争和工会权力很重要,但他们认为,这两者都是资本主义民主国家组织中更根本的差异所内生的。具体来说,中左翼政府产生于公共关系共识政治制度(而不是多数主义制度),而强大的工会则起源于协调资本主义(而不是自由资本主义)。政治代表和生产组织的这些差异在世纪早期共同发展起来,并解释了跨国分配和再分配模式。集群起源于19世纪后半叶两种截然不同的政治经济条件:一种是地方协调经济与强大的行会传统和对同种资产的大量投资相结合,另一种是市场经济与自由国家和更多移动的资产相结合。
The authors present an alternative to power resource theory as an approach to the study of distribution and redistribution. While they agree that partisanship and union power are important, they argue that both are endogenous to more fundamental differences in the organization of capitalist democracies. Specifically, center-left governments result from PR consensus political systems (as opposed to majoritarian systems), while strong unions have their origins in coordinated (as opposed to liberal) capitalism. These differences in political representation and in the organization of production developed jointly in the early twentieth century and explain the cross-national pattern of distribution and redistribution. The clusters have their origins in two distinct political economic conditions in the second half of the nineteenth century: one in which locally coordinated economies were coupled with strong guild traditions and heavy investment in cospecific assets and one in which market-based economies were coupled with liberal states and more mobile assets.