Norms for word lists that create false memories
Norms for word lists that create false memories
复制标题
产生错误记忆的单词列表规范
DOI：
10.3758/bf03211543
复制
发表时间：
1999
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
K. McDermott
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Stadler;Henry L. Roediger;K. McDermott
Roediger和McDermott（1995）诱导了对列表中没有出现的单词的错误回忆和错误识别。他们让受试者研究24个15个单词的列表，这些单词与列表中没有出现的一个常见单词（称为关键目标或关键诱饵）相关联。错误回忆和错误识别的关键目标经常发生在这些名单的反应。目前工作的目的是为Roediger和McDermott使用的清单以及最近开发的其他12个清单提供一套规范性数据。我们从36个列表中测试了关键目标的错误回忆和错误识别。尽管事实上，所有的列表都是为了产生错误的记忆，但它们的有效性差异很大-60%或更多的受试者错误地回忆了窗口和睡眠，这些项目的错误识别率超过80%。然而，从国王产生的列表导致10%的错误召回和27%的错误识别。可能的原因，这些广泛的差异的有效性的列表进行了讨论。这些规范作为一个有用的基准设计实验的错误回忆和错误再认在这个范式。
Roediger and McDermott (1995) induced false recall and false recognition for words that were not presented in lists. They had subjects study 24 lists of 15 words that were associates of a common word (called the critical target or critical lure) that was not presented in the list. False recall and false recognition of the critical target occurred frequently in response to these lists. The purpose of the current work was to provide a set of normative data for the lists Roediger and McDermott used and for 12 others developed more recently. We tested false recall and false recognition for critical targets from 36 lists. Despite the fact that all lists were constructed to produce false remembering, the diversity in their effectiveness was large—60% or more of subjects falsely recalledwindow andsleep following the appropriate lists, and false recognition for these items was greater than 80%. However, the list generated fromking led to 10% false recall and 27% false recognition. Possible reasons for these wide differences in effectiveness of the lists are discussed. These norms serve as a useful benchmark for designing experiments about false recall and false recognition in this paradigm.