The consensus problem in psychoanalytic research
The consensus problem in psychoanalytic research
复制标题
精神分析研究中的共识问题
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1966
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. F. Seitz
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. F. Seitz
精神分析（和心理治疗）研究中的共识问题是指临床医生在对同一组（访谈）数据的解释上达成一致的困难。这个问题存在于每个科学领域，尽管有些科学必然比其他科学更多地依赖于解释。考古学和古生物学是科学的例子，它们必须利用大量的解释来尝试从碎片观测数据合成和重建完整的图片。心理动力学研究，包括心理治疗研究，是另一个这样的例子。精神分析表明，在没有直接、直接、客观可观察的表现的情况下，人格和行为现象往往会广泛发生。心理动力学的研究者必须开发“解读字里行间”和“将事物拼凑在一起”的方法，即解释总体情况的某些方面，这些方面不是立即显而易见的，可能只能间接提及，或者甚至可能因在明显行为中的缺席而引人注目。
The consensus problem in psychoanalytic (and psychotherapeutic) research refers to the difficulty that clinicians have in agreeing upon the interpretation of the same set of (interview) data. This problem exists in every field of science, although some sciences necessarily depend more upon interpretation than others. Archeology and paleontology are examples of sciences that must utilize considerable interpretation in attempting to synthesize and reconstruct total pictures from fragmentary observational data. Psychodynamic research, which includes research in psychotherapy, is another such example. Psychoanalysis has shown how extensively the phenomena of personality and behavior tend to occur without direct, straightforward, objectively observable manifestations. The investigator of psychological dynamics must develop methods for “reading between the lines” and “piecing things together”—i.e., for interpreting certain aspects of the total situation that are not immediately apparent, may only be alluded to indirectly, or may even be conspicuous by their absence from the manifest behavior.