Enhancing Community-Based Participatory Research Through Human-Centered Design Strategies
Enhancing Community-Based Participatory Research Through Human-Centered Design Strategies
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1524839919850557
复制
发表时间：
2020-01-01
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Moracco, Kathryn E.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chen, Elizabeth;Leos, Cristina;Moracco, Kathryn E.
介绍。本综述的目的是比较和对比以人为本的设计（HCD）和基于社区的参与性研究（CBPR）方法的价值、目的、过程和结果，以解决公共卫生问题，并就如何将HCD纳入CBPR伙伴关系和项目提出建议。审查过程。通过查阅已发表的文献、原始材料和两种方法的专家，一个研究小组完成了一个分三个阶段的过程，综合了HCD和CBPR之间的关键异同，并为将HCD策略整合到CBPR项目中提出了建议。结果。有五种HCD策略可以很容易地纳入CBPR项目以改善结果：(1)组建跨学科团队，(2)中心移情，(3)招募并与“极端用户”合作，(4)快速原型，(5)创建有形的产品或服务。结论。将HCD纳入CBPR项目可能会产生可能影响更大、更容易采用、更有效的解决方案，并为公共卫生服务、产品和政策增加创新。
Introduction. The purpose of this review is to compare and contrast the values, purpose, processes, and outcomes of human-centered design (HCD) and community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches to address public health issues and to provide recommendations for how HCD can be incorporated into CBPR partnerships and projects. Review Process. By consulting published literature, source materials, and experts on both approaches, a team of researchers completed a three-phased process of synthesizing key similarities and differences between HCD and CBPR and generating recommendations for ways to integrate HCD strategies in CBPR projects. Results. There are five HCD strategies that can be readily incorporated into CBPR projects to improve outcomes: (1) form transdisciplinary teams, (2) center empathy, (3) recruit and work with "extreme users," (4) rapidly prototype, and (5) create tangible products or services. Conclusions. Integrating HCD in CBPR projects may lead to solutions that potentially have greater reach, are more readily adopted, are more effective, and add innovation to public health services, products, and policies.