Overlaps and Conflicts of Jurisdiction between the World Trade Organization and Regional Trade Agreements
Overlaps and Conflicts of Jurisdiction between the World Trade Organization and Regional Trade Agreements
复制标题
世界贸易组织与区域贸易协定管辖权的重叠和冲突
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2004
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
G. Marceau
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kyung Kwak;G. Marceau
Summary This article addresses the issue of horizontal allocation of judicial jurisdiction between the dispute settlement mechanisms of regional trade agreements (RTAs) and that of the World Trade Organization (WTO). There could be various instances where overlaps of jurisdiction in dispute settlement could occur. Overlaps and even conflicts of jurisdiction are unavoidable due to the quasi-automatic and compulsory nature of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. With a view to furthering discussions on this issue, the article proceeds to examine a number of principles of international commercial law that deal with overlaps and conflicts: forum conveniens and forum non conveniens; lis alibi pendens and res judicata as well as the principle of general international law; abuse of process, abuse of rights, and good faith; the exhaustion of RTA remedies; reference to the International Court of Justice; and the possibility of invoking Article 13 of the DSU to obtain evidence from RTA proceedings. Finally, the article suggests that in the current state of international law, no rules seem to offer any effective answer to resolve conflicts resulting from overlaps of jurisdiction in the context of the WTO Agreement and RTAs. It is thus for states to decide how the dispute settlement mechanisms of the WTO and RTAs should operate and interact with each other. The article concludes by pointing to areas of further discussions.