Is NSQIP Pediatric review representative of total institutional experience for children undergoing appendectomy?
Is NSQIP Pediatric review representative of total institutional experience for children undergoing appendectomy?
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.10.007
复制
发表时间:
2014-08-01
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
Blakely, Martin L.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Duggan, Eileen M.;Gates, Dan W.;Blakely, Martin L.
Background/purpose: NSQIP Pediatric (NSQIP-P) is a robust quality improvement effort. A limitation of the NSQIP process lies in capturing a small proportion of the total case volume. This study examines whether appendectomies captured by NSQIP-P are concordant with all appendectomies, the most commonly captured procedure in 2011.Methods: We compared case mix and 30-day outcomes between children undergoing an appendectomy who were included in NSQIP (n = 80) and children not captured by NSQIP (n = 276) during 2011 at a tertiary referral children's hospital. A single surgical case reviewer reviewed all cases using NSQIP-P methodology.Results: NSQIP-P captured 80 of a total of 356 appendectomies (22%). The case mix was similar between NSQIP and non-NSQIP groups (e.g., 31% of each group had complicated appendicitis). Outcomes were also similar; post-operative occurrences, readmissions and return to the operation room occurred at rates of 7.5% vs. 7.6%, 5% vs. 4.7%, and 3.8% vs. 4.3% respectively.Conclusion: Although NSQIP-P captured a minority of the total patient population that had an appendectomy, the case mix and outcomes were similar. Our results offer reassurance that NSQIP-P data are representative of the larger population for this procedure. Whether this concordance exists for procedures less commonly performed is unknown and a focus of ongoing work. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.