Development of a Japanese version of the Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale (RIBS-J): reliability and validity.
Development of a Japanese version of the Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale (RIBS-J): reliability and validity.
复制标题
开发日本版的报告和预期行为量表 (RIBS-J)：可靠性和有效性。
DOI：
10.1111/pcn.12151
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Ando S.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Yamaguchi S;Koike S;Watanabe K;Ando S.
报告和预期行为量表（RIBS）是在英国开发的，用于测量心理健康相关行为。目前的研究旨在评估的适用性，和可靠性的日本版本的RIBS（RIBS-J）在日本的背景下，并进一步研究结构效度的RIBS-J。MethodsThe样本包括224名本科生和研究生在日本大学。Cronbach's alpha被用来评估内部一致性。Pearson相关系数用于检验RIBS-J与心理健康知识量表之间的发散效度以及RIBS-J第二分量表与日语版社会距离量表之间的收敛效度。验证性因素分析评估了RIBS-J的模型拟合优度。我们还研究了重测信度与另一个本科生样本（n= 29）。报告了高内部一致性（α = 0.83）。RIBS-J的第二个分量表（测量预期行为）与心理健康知识量表（r= 0.33，P < 0.001）和日语版社会距离量表（r=-0.60，P < 0.001）相关。此外，验证性因素分析发现RIBS-J的模型拟合良好（χ2= 41.001，d.f. = 19，P= 0.002，拟合优度指数= 0.956，调整后拟合优度指数= 0.916，比较拟合指数= 0.955，近似均方根误差= 0.072）。总体重测信度（ρc）为0.71。结论RIBS-J是一个适当的和心理测量学上稳健的措施，对个人的心理健康问题在日本的行为。使用社区样本的进一步研究可以评估我们发现的普遍性。
AimThe Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale (RIBS) was developed in the UK to measure mental health‐related behavior. The current study aimed to evaluate the applicability, and reliability of a Japanese version of the RIBS (RIBS‐J) in a Japanese context, and further examine the construct validity of the RIBS‐J.MethodsThe sample included 224 undergraduate and postgraduate students at a Japanese university. Cronbach's alpha was used to assess internal consistency. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to examine the divergent validity between the RIBS‐J and the Mental Health Knowledge Schedule and the convergent validity between the second subscale of the RIBS‐J and Japanese version of the Social Distance Scale. Confirmatory factor analysis assessed the goodness of model fit of the RIBS‐J. We also examined test–retest reliability with another undergraduate sample (n= 29).ResultsMost items exhibited no floor/ceiling effect. High internal consistency (α = 0.83) was reported. The second subscale of the RIBS‐J, measuring intended behavior, correlated with the Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (r= 0.33,P< 0.001) and the Japanese version of the Social Distance Scale (r= −0.60,P< 0.001). In addition, confirmatory factor analysis found good model fit for the RIBS‐J (χ2= 41.001, d.f. = 19,P= 0.002, goodness‐of‐fit index = 0.956, adjusted goodness‐of‐fit index = 0.916, comparative fit index = 0.955, root mean square error of approximation = 0.072). Overall test–retest reliability (ρc) was 0.71.ConclusionThe RIBS‐J is an appropriate and psychometrically robust measure of behavior towards individuals with mental health problems in Japan. Further studies using a community sample could assess the generalizability of our findings.