OBSERVATIONS ON ESTIMATION OF QUANTITY OF EMPHYSEMA IN LUNGS BY POINT-SAMPLING METHOD
OBSERVATIONS ON ESTIMATION OF QUANTITY OF EMPHYSEMA IN LUNGS BY POINT-SAMPLING METHOD
复制标题
DOI:
10.1136/thx.20.5.462
复制
发表时间:
1965-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
10
通讯作者:
DUNNILL, MS
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
ANDERSON, JA;DUNNILL, MS
Assessment of the amount of emphysema in the lungs at necropsy necessitates measurement of the volumes of abnormal and normal tissue present. In a previous paper (Dunnill, 1962) a method was described for estimating separately the volumes of the emphysematous parenchyma, the normal parenchyma, and of the conducting vessels and airways (that is, the non-parenchyma) by a simple point-counting technique. This method entails fixing the lung in a controlled state of inflation and then cutting the fixed lung into approximately 1-cm. thick slices. The point-counting grid, composed of points drawn on a transparent plastic material, is placed over each slice, and the position of each point is noted, ie, whether it liesover normal lung parenchyma, emphysematous parenchyma, or non-parenchyma. The total number of points lying on each component is proportional to the area of each component on the cut slice, which in turn, according to the theorem of Delesse (1847), is proportional to the volume of the component in the lung. In the original paper the points were placed 1 cm. apart, at the angles of equilateral triangles, and this entailed counting some 2,000 to 3,000 points for each lung. If large numbersof lungs are to be assessed quantitatively in this manner, it is desirable to know (a) how many points it is necessary to count to achieve any given degree of accuracy; and (b) whether it is necessary to examine every slice of the lung in order to obtain an accurate measurement of the quantity of emphysema in that lung. It would be an obvious advantage if, for instance, the quantity of emphysema in a lung could be estimated from examination, by point counting, ofa single slice of lung, or of a section of whole lung prepared by the Gough and Wentworth (1949) technique. It is the purpose of this paper to investigate these two questions.