Comparing the Japanese Version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index and Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score for Dry Eye Symptom Assessment
Comparing the Japanese Version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index and Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score for Dry Eye Symptom Assessment
复制标题
比较日文版眼表疾病指数和干眼症相关生活质量评分对干眼症状的评估作用
DOI：
10.3390/diagnostics10040203
复制
发表时间：
2020-04-01
期刊：
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Murakami, Akira
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Inomata, Takenori;Nakamura, Masahiro;Murakami, Akira
这项研究的目的是比较日本版眼表疾病指数(J-OSDI)和干眼相关生活质量评分(DEQS)中患者报告的干眼病(DED)症状。2017年9月至2018年5月期间，共有169名参与者参加。患者在第一次(基线)和随访时接受J-OSDI和DEQS问卷调查，以评估DED相关症状。用皮尔逊相关系数评价J-OSDI总分与DEQS(频度)评分的相关性，用Bland-Altman分析评价两者的临床差异。在基线访问时，J-OSDI评分与DEQS(频率和程度)显著相关(r=0.855，r=0.897)。此外，J-OSDI评分与随访时的DEQS(频率和程度)显著相关(r=0.852，r=0.888)。Bland-Altman分析显示，两份问卷的分数在基线时的差异(偏差)为4.18个单位，在随访时为4.08个单位。J-OSDI和DEQS与可忽略的分数差异显著相关，这表明J-OSDI可以可靠地用于日本患者，允许进行跨国比较。
The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) between the Japanese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (J-OSDI) and the Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score (DEQS). A total of 169 participants were enrolled between September 2017 and May 2018. Patients were administered the J-OSDI and DEQS questionnaires at their first (baseline) and follow-up visits to evaluate DED-related symptoms. The correlations between the J-OSDI total score and DEQS (Frequency and Degree) scores were evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient, and their clinical differences were assessed using the Bland-Altman analysis. At the baseline visit, the J-OSDI score and DEQS (Frequency and Degree) were significantly correlated (r = 0.855, r = 0.897, respectively). Moreover, a significant correlation was found between the J-OSDI score and DEQS (Frequency and Degree) at the follow-up visit (r = 0.852, r = 0.888, respectively). The Bland-Altman analysis revealed a difference (bias) of 4.18 units at the baseline and 4.08 units at the follow-up between the scores of the two questionnaires. The J-OSDI and DEQS were significantly correlated with negligible score differences, suggesting that the J-OSDI can be reliably used for Japanese patients, allowing for cross-country comparisons.