Politicizing disaster governance: Can a board game stimulate discussions around disasters as matters of concern?
Politicizing disaster governance: Can a board game stimulate discussions around disasters as matters of concern?
复制标题
将灾害治理政治化：棋盘游戏能否激发人们对灾害的讨论？
DOI：
10.1177/25148486211069000
复制
发表时间：
2022
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Gina Delima
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. Mertens;B. Bwambale;Gina Delima
减少灾害风险（DRR）界倾向于以管理和技术官僚的方式对待灾害和风险，从而忽视了DRR的高度政治性质。另一种认识论的灾难，作为“问题的关注”，提出和测试。本文利用Chantal Mouffe和Bruno Latour的概念，阐述了如何将DRR转变为公共问题。有人认为，认识到灾害的混合性会使减灾教育和政策制定受益。一个严肃的游戏被用来调查提出的认识论。这款棋盘游戏模拟了在乌干达西南部减少洪水和山体滑坡风险的政治决策。据推测，游戏可以创造一个理想的演讲场景，促进玩家之间的讨论，甚至可能创造一个政治对抗的空间。在10个游戏过程中的讨论被记录、转录和分析(1)，以了解占主导地位的认识论如何促进对灾难的非政治方法；(2)了解玩棋盘游戏时带来的政治化和非政治化过程，以便为未来的工具提供建议，以促进对灾难的政治欣赏。我们的研究结果表明，参与者在游戏过程中有效地体验了影响、权力关系和对抗，但玩家使用共识和技术解决方案的呼吁来结束讨论，并继续提出具体的解决方案。本文的见解有助于理解为什么DRR经常被视为地方和国际灾害治理中的技术问题。本文提出的认识论和方法有望激发创新实验，朝着更具政治意义的DRR教育和政策方向发展。
The disaster risk reduction (DRR) community tends to treat disasters and risks in a managerial and technocratic way, thereby disregarding the highly political nature of DRR. An alternative epistemology of disasters, as “matters of concern”, is proposed and tested. Mobilizing concepts from Chantal Mouffe and Bruno Latour, this paper illustrates how DRR can be transformed into a public issue. It is argued that education and policymaking on DRR would benefit from a recognition of the hybrid nature of disasters. A serious game is used to investigate proposed epistemology. The board game simulates political decision-making on the reduction of risks due to floods and landslides in South-West Uganda. It is hypothesized that the game can generate an ideal speech scenario that fosters discussions among players and possibly even creates a space of political confrontation. Discussions during ten gameplays have been recorded, transcribed and analyzed (1) to understand how the dominant epistemology facilitates an apolitical approach to disasters and (2) to understand the process of politicization and de-politicization brought about when playing the board game in order to derive recommendations for future tools to facilitate a political appreciation of disasters. Our results indicate that participants effectively experience affects, power relations and confrontations during the game, but that a call for consensus and technical solutions is used by the players to close the discussions and move on with concrete solutions. Insights from this paper contribute to understanding why DRR is frequently treated as a technical issue in local and international disaster governance. Epistemology and approaches proposed in this paper are expected to stimulate innovative experiments towards a more political approach to DRR education and policy.
减少自然灾害风险的混合计划
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
Environmental Hazards (In press)
影响因子：
--
作者：
Scawthorn;Charles
通讯作者：
Charles
<战争的神话化> <战争的记忆> - 根据德国女孩的一战日记改编
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
駿台史学 127
影响因子：
--
作者：
K.;Saeki;et. al.;柴 宜弘;佐伯弘次(共編);木村 真;KIMURA Matoko;柴 宜弘(編);柴 宜弘(編);SHIBA Nobuhiro (ed.);SHIBA Nobuhiro (ed.);柴 宜弘編;柴 宣弘(編);柴 宣弘(研究代表者);柴 宜弘(編);SHIBA Nobuhiro (ed.);SHIBA Nobuhiro (ed.);SHIBA Nobuhiro (ed.);柴 宜弘(編);SHIBA Nobuhiro (ed.);YAMASAKI Shinichi;桜井 万里子(編);山崎 信一;三宅 立
通讯作者：
三宅 立