Where college students look for vaping information and what information they believe
Where college students look for vaping information and what information they believe
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/07448481.2018.1549557
复制
发表时间：
2020-05-18
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Cheney, Marshall K.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dobbs, Page D.;Clawson, Ashley H.;Cheney, Marshall K.
目的：这项融合混合方法研究探讨了信息来源如何影响大学生对vaping的信念和知识。参与者：大学生完成了一项调查（n = 522; 2016年1月至4月）或接受了采访（n = 33; 2015-2016）。方法：大学生完成了一项在线调查，询问学生“在哪里”听说过电子烟，以及他们听到了什么。对反应进行量化，并进行卡方分析。此外，还对大学生电子烟用户进行了有关信息来源可信度的采访。对编码访谈进行了主题分析。结果如下：电子烟的信息来源（社会来源，媒体，广告，教育/研究）与他们回忆的信息之间存在显着关系。吸电子烟的朋友和电子烟用户是最可靠的信息来源。确认偏差和科学性阳痿偏差是电子烟信息评估的特征。结论：在大学校园工作的健康教育专家应该通过大学生最团结的沟通渠道提供准确的信息。
Objective: This convergent mixed methods study examined how information sources influence college students' beliefs and knowledge about vaping. Participants: College students either completed a survey (n = 522; January-April, 2016) or were interviewed (n = 33; 2015-2016). Methods: College students completed an online survey asking 'where' students had heard about e-cigarette and 'what' they had heard. Responses were quantified and a chi-square analysis was conducted. Additional college student e-cigarette users were interviewed about the credibility of information sources. Thematic analysis was conducted with the coded interviews. Results: There was a significant relationship between information sources for e-cigarettes (social sources, media, advertising, education/research) and the messages they recalled. Friends who vaped and e-cigarette users were the most credible information sources. Confirmation bias and scientific impotence bias characterized assessment of e-cigarette information. Conclusions: Health education specialists working on college campuses should provide accurate information via communication channels most unitized by college students.