Emotion regulation strategies in daily life: mindfulness, cognitive reappraisal and emotion suppression
Emotion regulation strategies in daily life: mindfulness, cognitive reappraisal and emotion suppression
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/16506073.2016.1218926
复制
发表时间：
2017-01-01
影响因子：
4.7
通讯作者：
Kashdan, Todd
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Brockman, Robert;Ciarrochi, Joseph;Kashdan, Todd
大多数情绪调节的实证研究都依赖于回顾性特质测量，并没有研究日常调节策略和日常情绪幸福感之间的联系。我们使用了每日日记的方法与多层次建模数据分析（n=187），以研究三种情绪调节策略（正念，认知重评和情绪抑制）的影响，对日常的负面和积极的影响。我们的研究结果表明，日常正念与较低的负面和较高的积极影响，而匡威的模式被发现为日常情绪抑制;认知重新评价与日常积极的，但不是负面的影响。当日常正念，抑制和重新评价被纳入相同的模型时，这些策略预测了情绪幸福感的独特差异。随机斜率分析显示，这些策略的效用有很大的差异。事实上，在大约一半的样本中，假定的适应性认知重新评价策略似乎对调节负面情绪没有任何好处。进一步的分析显示，年龄缓和的影响，认知重新评价对日常的负面影响：较高的使用重新评价与更多的负面影响的青少年（17至19岁），但变得与较少的负面影响随着年龄的增长。我们解释这些结果符合情绪调节的上下文视图，其中没有策略是天生的好或坏。
Most empirical studies of emotion regulation have relied on retrospective trait measures, and have not examined the link between daily regulatory strategies and every day emotional well-being. We used a daily diary methodology with multilevel modelling data analyses (n=187) to examine the influence of three emotion regulation strategies (mindfulness, cognitive reappraisal and emotion suppression) on the experience of daily negative and positive affect. Our results suggested that daily mindfulness was associated with lower negative and higher positive affect whereas the converse pattern was found for daily emotion suppression; cognitive reappraisal was related to daily positive, but not negative affect. When daily mindfulness, suppression and reappraisal were included in the same models, these strategies predicted unique variance in emotional well-being. Random slope analyses revealed substantial variability in the utility of these strategies. Indeed the presumably adaptive cognitive reappraisal strategy seemed to confer no benefit to the regulation of negative affect in approximately half the sample. Additional analyses revealed that age moderates the effect of cognitive reappraisal on daily negative affect: Higher use of reappraisal was associated with more negative affect for adolescents (aged 17 to 19) but became associated with less negative affect with increasing age. We interpret these results in line with a contextual view of emotion regulation where no strategy is inherently good or bad.