Biased under-reporting of research reflects biased under-submission more than biased editorial rejection.
Biased under-reporting of research reflects biased under-submission more than biased editorial rejection.
复制标题
DOI：
10.12688/f1000research.2-1.v1
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Dickersin K
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chalmers I;Dickersin K
Stephen Senn质疑Ben Goldacre在“Bad Pharma”中的主张，即有偏见的编辑接受具有“积极”发现的报告并不是有偏见的研究报告的原因。我们同意Senn的观点，即有偏见的编辑决定可能会导致报告偏见，但Senn忽略了研究人员提交报告以供可能发表的有偏见的决定是问题的主要原因的证据。
Stephen Senn challenges Ben Goldacre’s assertion in ‘Bad Pharma’ that biased editorial acceptance of reports with ‘positive’ findings is not a cause of biased under-reporting of research. We agree with Senn that biased editorial decisions may contribute to reporting bias, but Senn ignores the evidence that biased decisions by researchers to submit reports for possible publication are the main causes of the problem.