Asymmetric Switch Costs in Numeral Naming and Number Word Reading: Implications for Models of Bilingual Language Production.

Asymmetric Switch Costs in Numeral Naming and Number Word Reading: Implications for Models of Bilingual Language Production.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02011
复制
发表时间:
2015
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Peressotti F
Peressotti F
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Reynolds MG;Schlöffel S;Peressotti F

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

一种用于深入了解双语语言理解和产生过程的方法是研究转换语言所产生的成本。对于不平衡的双语者,不对称的转换成本报告在语音生产,其中L1的转换成本大于L2的转换成本,而对称的转换成本报告在语言理解任务,其中切换的成本是相同的L1和L2。目前,还不清楚为什么不对称的转换成本观察到在言语生产,而不是在语言理解。三个实验报告,同时检查方法论的解释任务相关的差异,在转换成本不对称和预测的三个帐户的转换成本不对称的讲话生产。这些实验的结果表明:(1)语言任务的类型(理解与产出)决定了是否观察到不对称的转换成本;(2)至少有一些转换成本不对称是在语言系统中产生的。
One approach used to gain insight into the processes underlying bilingual language comprehension and production examines the costs that arise from switching languages. For unbalanced bilinguals, asymmetric switch costs are reported in speech production, where the switch cost for L1 is larger than the switch cost for L2, whereas, symmetric switch costs are reported in language comprehension tasks, where the cost of switching is the same for L1 and L2. Presently, it is unclear why asymmetric switch costs are observed in speech production, but not in language comprehension. Three experiments are reported that simultaneously examine methodological explanations of task related differences in the switch cost asymmetry and the predictions of three accounts of the switch cost asymmetry in speech production. The results of these experiments suggest that (1) the type of language task (comprehension vs. production) determines whether an asymmetric switch cost is observed and (2) at least some of the switch cost asymmetry arises within the language system.