Policy and constituency frames in the advocacy of political parties and interest groups in policy-making
Policy and constituency frames in the advocacy of political parties and interest groups in policy-making
复制标题
政党和利益集团在政策制定中倡导的政策和选区框架
DOI：
10.1080/13501763.2022.2138952
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
A. Wonka
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Wonka
摘要 本文介绍了比较分析政党和利益集团在立法政策制定中的倡导行为的理论视角。它将政治行为者以政策为中心和以群体为中心的声明分别概念化为政策框架和选区框架。为了衡量政策和选区框架提供的分析杠杆，我将分别对政党和利益集团对这两种框架的依赖程度进行理论分析。在德国立法决策的两个案例中评估了这两种框架的经验相关性。根据议会辩论、委员会听证会上提出的立场文件以及利益团体发布的新闻声明，我表明选区框架在这些参与者的倡导中发挥着重要作用。尽管激进政党和温和政党对政策和选区框架的使用有所不同，但政党和利益集团之间的使用几乎没有任何差异。
ABSTRACT This paper introduces a theoretical perspective for the comparative analysis of the advocacy behavior of political parties and interest groups in legislative policy-making. It conceptualizes the policy-centered and group-centered statements of political actors as policy frames and constituency frames, respectively. In order to gauge the analytical leverage provided by policy and constituency frames, I will theorize the extent to which political parties and interest groups rely on these two types of frames respectively. The empirical relevance of both types of frames is assessed in two cases of legislative policy-making in Germany. Drawing on parliamentary debates, position papers presented in committee hearings, and press statements released by interest groups, I show, amongst others, that constituency frames play a significant role in these actors’ advocacy. While the use of policy and constituency frames varies between radical and moderate parties, there are hardly any differences in their use between parties and interest groups.
社会地位、政治优先事项和不平等代表性
影响因子：
5.3
作者：
Traber;Denise;Miriam Hänni;Nathalie Giger;Christian Breunig
通讯作者：
Christian Breunig
位置、选择性强调和框架
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Szöcsik
通讯作者：
Szöcsik