Planning Theory and Practice: Bridging the Gap
Planning Theory and Practice: Bridging the Gap
复制标题
规划理论与实践：弥合差距
DOI：
10.1177/0739456x8300300105
复制
发表时间：
1983
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
J. I. Neufville
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. I. Neufville
近年来，越来越多的证据表明计划理论已经不适用了。它不仅不能指导实践，而且会导致实践者之间的认知失调和疏远。各规划学派都不同意将任何文学作品和思想视为规划理论。计划就像一个“危机中”的范例，因为理论与经验不相吻合。此外，作为规划实践主要范例的两个主要候选模式-总体规划模式或政策分析模式-都不足以为外地提供一致性
There is increasing evidence that plan ning theory has been inadequate in recent years. Not only does it fail to guide prac tice, it contributes to cognitive dissonance and alienation among practitioners. Plan ning schools agree on no body of litera ture and ideas to count as planning theory. Planning is like a paradigm "in crisis," in that theory does not mesh with experience. Moreover, neither of the two main candidates for the prime exemplar for planning practice—the master plan model or the policy analysis model — is acceptable enough to provide coherence to the field