The Socioecological Fix: Fixed Capital, Metabolism, and Hegemony
The Socioecological Fix: Fixed Capital, Metabolism, and Hegemony
复制标题
社会生态修复：固定资本、新陈代谢和霸权
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Prudham
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Ekers;S. Prudham
本文是两篇文章中的第二篇，认为社会生态修复的概念化涉及到理解固定资本作为一种生产力，如何改变社会生态条件和生产力，同时确保特定社会等级、权力关系和制度的霸权。我们强调，固定资本是内在的政治生态在其宪法和它如何塑造景观改造的社会生态过程。固定资本必然凝结社会生态材料和过程，可以被理解为与价值流通和社会劳动配置相联系的自然生产形式。因此，固定资本本质上是新陈代谢的，是社会生态的内在化和转化。我们还讨论了固定的资本在社会生态景观的过程中，涉及正式和真实的包容的性质。我们强调固定资本形成在形成社会生态条件和生产力以及更广泛地说，日常生活中的双重作用。因此，我们认为，固定资本形成作为一个新陈代谢的过程，不能完全概念化，在狭义的经济术语。我们转向葛兰西和一些最近的工作在政治生态学认为，社会生态修复需要理解的意识形态方面，特别是在建立和维护霸权。
This article, the second of two, argues that conceptualizing the socioecological fix involves understanding how fixed capital, as a produced production force, can transform the socioecological conditions and forces of production while also securing the hegemony of particular social hierarchies, power relations, and institutions. We stress that fixed capital is inherently political–ecological in its constitution and how it shapes socioecological processes of landscape transformation. Fixed capital necessarily congeals socioecological materials and processes and can be understood as a produced form of nature tied to the circulation of value and the deployment of social labor. Fixed capital is therefore inherently metabolic and internalizes and transforms socioecologies. We also discuss the fixing of capital within socioecological landscapes as processes involving both the formal and real subsumption of nature. We emphasize the dual role of fixed capital formation in shaping the socioecological conditions and forces of production and, more broadly, of everyday life. Thus, we argue, fixed capital formation as a metabolic process cannot be fully conceptualized in narrowly economic terms. We turn to Gramsci and some recent work in political ecology to argue that socioecological fixes need to be understood in ideological terms and specifically in the establishment and contestation of hegemony.