Anxiety, Inhibition, Efficiency, and Effectiveness An Investigation Using the Antisaccade Task
Anxiety, Inhibition, Efficiency, and Effectiveness An Investigation Using the Antisaccade Task
复制标题
DOI：
10.1027/1618-3169.56.1.48
复制
发表时间：
2009-01-01
影响因子：
1.3
通讯作者：
Eysenck, Michael W.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Derakshan, Nazanin;Ansari, Tahereh L.;Eysenck, Michael W.
焦虑的影响进行了评估。这项任务的绩效（以错误率为指标）反映了抑制过程解决的意志和反射反应之间的冲突（赫顿，S。B.，& Ettinger，U.（2006年）。作为精神病理学研究工具的反跳跃任务：一个批判性评论。Psychophysiology，43，302-313）.然而，第一次正确扫视的延迟反映了处理效率（性能有效性和资源使用之间的关系）。在两个实验中，高焦虑的参与者比低焦虑的参与者有更长的正确的反滑步延迟，这种效果比积极或中性的威胁线索更大。高焦虑组和低焦虑组在反跳跃任务的错误率方面没有差异。没有组间差异被发现在潜伏期或错误率在正面任务。这些结果表明，焦虑影响绩效效率，但不影响绩效。的.研究结果在注意力控制理论（Eysenck，M. W.，Derakshan，N.，桑托斯河，& Calvo，M. G.（2007年）。焦虑和认知表现：注意力控制理论。Emotion，7（2），336-353）.
Effects of anxiety on the antisaccade task were assessed. Performance effectiveness on this task (indexed by error rate) reflects a conflict between volitional and reflexive responses resolved by inhibitory processes (Hutton, S. B., & Ettinger, U. ( 2006). The antisaccade task as a research tool in psychopathology: A critical review. Psychophysiology, 43, 302-313). However, latency of the first correct saccade reflects processing efficiency (relationship between performance effectiveness and use of resources). In two experiments, high-anxious participants had longer correct antisaccade latencies than low-anxious participants and this effect was greater with threatening cues than positive or neutral ones. The high- and low-anxious groups did not differ in terms of error rate in the antisaccade task. No group differences were found in terms of latency or error rate in the prosaccade task. These results indicate that anxiety affects performance efficiency but not performance effectiveness. The. findings are interpreted within the context of attentional control theory (Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7 (2), 336-353).