More genes versus environment
More genes versus environment
复制标题
更多基因与环境
作者:
B. Waksman
malian radiation always retaining something of the ancestral sprawling gait. Two complete humeri from the Eocene have been published as stereophotographs and show features to support this8, including a marked residuum of the primitive torsion between humeral head and elbow condyle. Sereno and McKenna2 now argue from the features of their beautiful specimen of a small, Late Cretaceous multituberculate forelimb that it was very like that of therians and was swung parasagittally over a considerable range. A corollary is that therians and multituberculates share this advance, not shown by monotremes. Non-palaeontologists should note that the methods used in these studies are not speculative descriptions of how the dead bones may have articulated and moved: a considerable number of osteological features are scored objectively to evaluate functional and phylogenetic correlations. However, many fossil specimens show cracks and distortions which can make biometrics inexact. There is need for caution in relation to these new conclusions. The detail is obtained from one or two species in a long-lived radiation that must have adapted to a variety of niches. How likely is it that all multituberculates over this huge time span were restricted to low-frequency hearing? If the forelimb was advanced in a Cretaceous form and primitive in an Eocene form, from the same taeniolabidoid group, how secure is any assumption about the timing of the advance? We derive from marsupials and placentals knowledge of a broad range of adaptions, but the monotremes, platypus and echidna, are very specialized in locomotion and hearing, and we still only guess at the primitive ancestral form. With important new material coming from the efforts of Australian palaeontologists and from the recent American-Mongolian expeditions, we can hope that more well preseived skeletal finds will provide both interesting answers and surprises within this somewhat neglected part of our family history. D
影响因子:
56.9
作者:
FUJINAMI, RS;OLDSTONE, MBA
通讯作者:
OLDSTONE, MBA