The affective commons of Coworking

The affective commons of Coworking
复制标题

联合办公的情感共享

DOI:
10.1177/0018726719894633
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
影响因子:
5.7
通讯作者:
C. Duff
C. Duff
中科院分区:
管理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Waters;C. Duff

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

Cowork是一种什么样的共同项目?合作最初是作为一种新的模式提出的,可以在一个有着进步抱负的工人社区中组织自主、真实和创造性的劳动。这一承诺并不总是在实践中实现,这在许多同事中引发了强烈的矛盾情绪。这篇文章对这种矛盾心理进行了批判性的评估,我们通过一个新的理论范畴--情感公地来探讨这种矛盾心理。这种公地描述了同事非物质劳动的大气产物,包括社区在关于合作的吸引力的描述中所认可的“公有”过程可能表现出来的。在这方面,关于合作的矛盾心态可以被视为在共享资源的共享工作中产生的冲突的结果,特别是关于集中资源的获取和商品化的冲突,以及公平地承认劳动机构对其流通和繁殖所作的贡献。我们认为,这种矛盾心理来自合作安排本身,而不是表征许多非标准工作的更广泛的早熟条件。最后,我们简要讨论了我们的分析对正在进行的努力的实际影响,以解决这种矛盾心理并维持合作的互惠关系。
What kind of common project is Coworking? Coworking was first presented as a novel model for organising autonomous, authentic and creative labour amid a community of workers who share these progressive aspirations. That this promise has not always been realised in practice has provoked a strong sense of ambivalence among many Coworkers. This article offers a critical assessment of this ambivalence, which we approach by way of a novel theoretical category, an affective commons. Such a commons describes the atmospheric product of the immaterial labour of Coworkers, including the ‘commoning’ processes by which the community endorsed in accounts of the appeal of Coworking may manifest. In this respect, ambivalence about Coworking may be regarded as an effect of conflicts that arise in the shared work of commoning, particularly conflict over the capture and commodification of pooled resources, and fair acknowledgement of the contributions labouring bodies make to their circulation and reproduction. We argue that this ambivalence emerges from Coworking arrangements themselves, rather than the broader conditions of precarity that characterise much nonstandard work. We close with a brief discussion of the practical implications of our analysis for ongoing efforts to address this ambivalence and sustain the mutualism of Coworking.
情感理论读本
DOI: 10.1215/9780822393047-005
发表时间: 2010
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
Highmore B
通讯作者: Highmore B
关系中的影响:家庭、地点、技术
DOI: 10.4324/9781315163864
发表时间: 2018
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Röttger-Rössler;Birgitt;Jan (eds.)
通讯作者: Jan (eds.)