Japan, Asian-Pacific Security, and the Case for Analytical Eclecticism
Japan, Asian-Pacific Security, and the Case for Analytical Eclecticism
复制标题
日本、亚太安全以及分析折衷主义的案例
DOI：
10.1162/016228801753399754
复制
发表时间：
2001
影响因子：
5
通讯作者：
Nobuo Okawara
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Katzenstein;Nobuo Okawara
我们不想让他们承担任何遗漏或委员会的剩余错误，我们要感谢他们对本文早期草案的批评，评论和建议：Amitav Acharya，托马斯伯杰，罗伯特布洛克，托马斯克里斯滕森，苏珊娜Feske，迈克尔绿色，沃尔特哈奇，布赖恩工作，查尔默斯约翰逊，阿拉斯泰尔伊恩约翰斯顿，Kozo加藤，罗伯特基奥汉，斯蒂芬克拉斯纳，埃利斯克劳斯，大卫Leheny，T.J. Pempel、Richard Samuels、Keiichi Tsunekawa和Robert Uriu，以及加州大学、圣地亚哥大学、康奈尔大学和青山学院大学的研讨会成员。我们也非常感谢两位匿名评论者的批评和建议，以及大量日本和中国政府官员和政策顾问慷慨地与我们分享他们的时间。
Without saddling them for any of the remaining errors of omission or commission, we would like to thank for their criticisms, comments, and suggestions on earlier drafts of this article: Amitav Acharya, Thomas Berger, Robert Bullock, Thomas Christensen, Susanne Feske, Michael Green, Walter Hatch, Brian Job, Chalmers Johnson, Alastair Iain Johnston, Kozo Kato, Robert Keohane, Stephen Krasner, Ellis Krauss, David Leheny, T.J. Pempel, Richard Samuels, Keiichi Tsunekawa, and Robert Uriu, as well as members of seminars at the University of California, San Diego, Cornell University, and Aoyama Gakuin University. We are also very much indebted to two anonymous reviewers for their criticisms and suggestions and to a large number of Japanese and Chinese government ofacials and policy advisers for generously sharing their time with us.