Characterization of the spatial resolution of different high-frequency imaging systems using a novel anechoic-sphere phantom.
Characterization of the spatial resolution of different high-frequency imaging systems using a novel anechoic-sphere phantom.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1109/tuffc.2011.1990
复制
发表时间:
2011-05
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Ketterling JA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Filoux E;Mamou J;Aristizábal O;Ketterling JA
The spatial resolution of high-frequency ultrasound (HFU, >20 MHz) imaging systems is usually determined using wires perpendicular to the beam. Recently, two tissue-mimicking phantoms (TMPs) were developed to estimate the three-dimensional (3D) resolution. Each of the TMPs consist of nine, 1 cm wide slabs of tissue-mimicking material containing randomly distributed anechoic spheres. All anechoic spheres in one slab have the same dimensions, and their diameter is increased from 0.1 mm in the first slab to 1.09 mm in the last. The scattering background for one set of slabs was fabricated using 3.5 µm glass beads, while those of the second set were 6.4 µm. The ability of a HFU system to detect these spheres against a speckle background provides a realistic estimation of its 3D spatial resolution. In the present study, these TMPs were used with HFU systems using single-element transducers, linear arrays and annular arrays. The TMPs were immersed in water and each slab was scanned using a VisualSonics™ Vevo 770 and Vevo 2100, and a custom HFU system based on a 5-element annular array. The annular array had a nominal center frequency of 40 MHz, a focal length of 12 mm, and a total aperture of 6 mm. A synthetic-focusing algorithm was used to form images with an increased depth-of-field. The penetration depth was increased by using a linear-chirp signal spanning 15 to 65 MHz over 4 µs. Results obtained with the custom system were compared to those of the Vevo systems (40 MHz probes RMV-704 and MS-550D) in terms of sphere detection, i.e., 3D spatial resolution, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Resulting B-mode images indicated that only the linear-array transducer failed to clearly resolve the 0.2 mm spheres, which showed that the 3D spatial resolution of the single-element and annular-array transducers was superior to that of the linear array. The single-element transducer could only detect these spheres over a narrow 1.5 mm depth-of-field, while the annular array was able to detect them to depths of at least 7 mm. For any size of the anechoic spheres, the annular array excited by a chirp-coded signal provided images of the highest contrast, with a maximum CNR of 1.8 at the focus, compared to 1.3 when using impulse excitation and 1.6 with the single-element transducer and linear array. This imaging configuration also provided CNRs above 1.2 over a wide depth range of 8 mm, while CNRs would quickly drop below 1 outside the focal zone of the other configurations.