A comparison of acoustic-prosodic entrainment in face-to-face and remote collaborative learning dialogues
A comparison of acoustic-prosodic entrainment in face-to-face and remote collaborative learning dialogues
复制标题
面对面和远程协作学习对话中声学韵律夹带的比较
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Heather Pon
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nichola Lubold;Heather Pon
如今，人们远程进行商务会议的可能性与面对面一样大。个人远程获得大学学位，生病的病人可以在家看医生。尤其重要的是，鉴于这种流行，远程设置正在提出面对面设置中不存在的通信挑战。诸如面部表情和肢体语言等视觉线索要么退化，要么不存在。在本文中，我们感兴趣的是远程设置如何影响口语对话相比，面对面的设置。我们专注于夹带，一种谈话现象，个体在互动过程中相互适应。具体来说，我们调查声学韵律夹带，其中个人变得更加相似，在他们的音高，响度，或说话的速度。我们探讨了三种不同的措施，声学韵律夹带，远程设置，面对面的设置，轮流的基础上比较。我们的研究结果表明，这两种设置不同的夹带形式，这表明，存在或不存在的视觉线索，如面部表情和肢体语言的夹带程度的影响。
Today, people are just as likely to have a business meeting remotely as they are face-to-face. Individuals obtain college degrees remotely and sick patients can visit the doctor from home. Especially important in light of this popularity, remote settings are posing communication challenges that are not present in face-to-face settings. Visual cues such as facial expressions and body language are either degraded or nonexistent. In this paper, we are interested in how remote settings affect spoken dialogue when compared to face-to-face settings. We focus on entrainment, a phenomenon of conversation where individuals adapt to each other during the interaction. Specifically, we investigate acoustic-prosodic entrainment, where individuals become more similar in their pitch, loudness, or speaking rate. We explore three different measures of acoustic-prosodic entrainment, comparing remote settings to face-to-face settings on a turn-by-turn basis. Our results indicate that the two settings do differ for different forms of entrainment, suggesting that the presence or absence of visual cues such as facial expressions and body language has an impact on the degree of entrainment.